Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty at Calling: London
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
7 players • Match results by round
Tip: Click any player row to see detailed round-by-round calculations
dropped • 6-3-0
78%
Meta
+1.2
Perf
3.6
Surp
2.1
Diff
45:55
R1 CC
Round 1: Win vs Noah Greenwood (Fang, Dracai of Blades) - Expected: 46:54
60:40
R2 CC
Round 2: Win vs Jean Luka Zorko (Aurora, Shooting Star) - Expected: 58:42
60:40
R3 CC
Round 3: Win vs Toni Savolainen (Aurora, Shooting Star) - Expected: 58:42
R4
R4 CC
Round 4: Loss vs Dominik Piatkowski (Dash I/O) - Expected: Not enough data (9 matches)
20:80
R5 CC
Round 5: Loss vs Mário Abrantes (Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry) - Expected: 21:79
60:40
R6 CC
Round 6: Win vs Francisco Pimenta (Cindra, Dracai of Retribution) - Expected: 62:38
R7
R7 CC
Round 7: Loss vs Johannes Schorpp (Dash, Inventor Extraordinaire) - Expected: Not enough data (2 matches)
60:40
R8 CC
Round 8: Win vs Jonathan YUSTE (Aurora, Shooting Star) - Expected: 58:42
80:20
R9 CC
Round 9: Win vs Mara Faris (Vynnset, Iron Maiden) - Expected: 78:22
Meta Fit
78% (7/9 favorable matchups)
Performance
+1.2 Wins (4.8 expected, 6 actual)
Surprise
3.6 total deviation
Difficulty
2.1 difficulty points
Round-by-Round Breakdown
Win probabilities rounded to nearest 5% for consistency with match display
Swipe left to see all columns →
| Round | Opponent | Expected | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | Fang, Dracai of Blades | 45% | Win |
| R2 | Aurora, Shooting Star | 60% | Win |
| R3 | Aurora, Shooting Star | 60% | Win |
| R4 | Dash I/O | 50% | Loss |
| R5 | Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry | 20% | Loss |
| R6 | Cindra, Dracai of Retribution | 60% | Win |
| R7 | Dash, Inventor Extraordinaire | 50% | Loss |
| R8 | Aurora, Shooting Star | 60% | Win |
| R9 | Vynnset, Iron Maiden | 80% | Win |
dropped • 6-3-0
56%
Meta
+2.0
Perf
4.0
Surp
3.8
Diff
60:40
R1 CC
Round 1: Win vs Lisa-Marie Schulte (Aurora, Shooting Star) - Expected: 58:42
60:40
R2 CC
Round 2: Loss vs David Calf (Aurora, Shooting Star) - Expected: 58:42
20:80
R3 CC
Round 3: Loss vs Deitrich Mohan (Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry) - Expected: 21:79
Round 4: Win vs Indigo Bosworth (Nuu, Alluring Desire) - Expected: 17:83, underdog victory
Round 5: Win vs Dennis Fröberg (Florian, Rotwood Harbinger) - Expected: 27:73, underdog victory
85:15
R6 CC
Round 6: Win vs Benedikt Sylvester (Prism, Awakener of Sol) - Expected: 86:14
60:40
R7 CC
Round 7: Win vs Luis Felipe Bueno da Silva (Aurora, Shooting Star) - Expected: 58:42
60:40
R8 CC
Round 8: Win vs Łukasz Cichecki (Aurora, Shooting Star) - Expected: 58:42
20:80
R9 CC
Round 9: Loss vs Maciej Chmielewski (Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry) - Expected: 21:79
Meta Fit
56% (5/9 favorable matchups)
Performance
+2.0 Wins (4.0 expected, 6 actual)
Surprise
4.0 total deviation
Difficulty
3.8 difficulty points
Round-by-Round Breakdown
Win probabilities rounded to nearest 5% for consistency with match display
Swipe left to see all columns →
| Round | Opponent | Expected | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | Aurora, Shooting Star | 60% | Win |
| R2 | Aurora, Shooting Star | 60% | Loss |
| R3 | Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry | 20% | Loss |
| R4 | Nuu, Alluring Desire | 15% | Win |
| R5 | Florian, Rotwood Harbinger | 25% | Win |
| R6 | Prism, Awakener of Sol | 85% | Win |
| R7 | Aurora, Shooting Star | 60% | Win |
| R8 | Aurora, Shooting Star | 60% | Win |
| R9 | Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry | 20% | Loss |
dropped • 5-4-0
78%
Meta
+0.4
Perf
3.1
Surp
1.8
Diff
75:25
R1 CC
Round 1: Win vs Thomas CHAMPEROUX (Zen, Tamer of Purpose) - Expected: 74:26
20:80
R2 CC
Round 2: Loss vs Daniel Rutkowski (Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry) - Expected: 21:79
15:85
R3 CC
Round 3: Loss vs Edgar Herrera Ramos (Nuu, Alluring Desire) - Expected: 17:83
75:25
R4 CC
Round 4: Win vs Javier Díez (Ira, Scarlet Revenger) - Expected: 76:24
R5
R5 CC
Round 5: Win vs Tanner Nguyen (Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X) - Expected: Not enough data (7 matches)
75:25
R6 CC
Round 6: Win vs Yi Jun Loh (Ira, Scarlet Revenger) - Expected: 76:24
R7
R7 CC
Round 7: Win vs Robbert Valkeneers (Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X) - Expected: Not enough data (7 matches)
R8
R8 CC
Round 8: Loss vs Thomas Battaglia (Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X) - Expected: Not enough data (7 matches)
R9
R9 CC
Round 9: Loss vs Matthew Sarrington (Kano, Dracai of Aether) - Expected: Not enough data (9 matches)
Meta Fit
78% (7/9 favorable matchups)
Performance
+0.4 Wins (4.6 expected, 5 actual)
Surprise
3.1 total deviation
Difficulty
1.8 difficulty points
Round-by-Round Breakdown
Win probabilities rounded to nearest 5% for consistency with match display
Swipe left to see all columns →
| Round | Opponent | Expected | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | Zen, Tamer of Purpose | 75% | Win |
| R2 | Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry | 20% | Loss |
| R3 | Nuu, Alluring Desire | 15% | Loss |
| R4 | Ira, Scarlet Revenger | 75% | Win |
| R5 | Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X | 50% | Win |
| R6 | Ira, Scarlet Revenger | 75% | Win |
| R7 | Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X | 50% | Win |
| R8 | Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X | 50% | Loss |
| R9 | Kano, Dracai of Aether | 50% | Loss |
dropped • 3-6-0
56%
Meta
-0.8
Perf
3.7
Surp
1.5
Diff
20:80
R1 CC
Round 1: Loss vs Daniel Hammer (Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry) - Expected: 21:79
15:85
R2 CC
Round 2: Loss vs Brian Mc Donagh (Nuu, Alluring Desire) - Expected: 17:83
R3
R3 CC
Round 3: Win vs Mika Vainio (Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn) - Expected: Not enough data (3 matches)
55:45
R4 CC
Round 4: Win vs Ronnie Fox (Jarl Vetreiði) - Expected: 54:46
R5
R5 CC
Round 5: Loss vs Joseph White (Kano, Dracai of Aether) - Expected: Not enough data (9 matches)
R6
R6 CC
Round 6: Loss vs Luca Love (Dash I/O) - Expected: Not enough data (9 matches)
R7
R7 CC
Round 7: Win vs Luke/Evelynn Poulter (Oscilio, Constella Intelligence) - Expected: Not enough data (8 matches)
40:60
R8 CC
Round 8: Loss vs Ryan Jackson (Levia, Shadowborn Abomination) - Expected: 40:60
45:55
R9 CC
Round 9: Loss vs Błażej Gierszon (Fang, Dracai of Blades) - Expected: 46:54
Meta Fit
56% (5/9 favorable matchups)
Performance
-0.8 Wins (3.8 expected, 3 actual)
Surprise
3.7 total deviation
Difficulty
1.5 difficulty points
Round-by-Round Breakdown
Win probabilities rounded to nearest 5% for consistency with match display
Swipe left to see all columns →
| Round | Opponent | Expected | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry | 20% | Loss |
| R2 | Nuu, Alluring Desire | 15% | Loss |
| R3 | Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn | 50% | Win |
| R4 | Jarl Vetreiði | 55% | Win |
| R5 | Kano, Dracai of Aether | 50% | Loss |
| R6 | Dash I/O | 50% | Loss |
| R7 | Oscilio, Constella Intelligence | 50% | Win |
| R8 | Levia, Shadowborn Abomination | 40% | Loss |
| R9 | Fang, Dracai of Blades | 45% | Loss |
dropped • 4-3-0
71%
Meta
+0.1
Perf
3.1
Surp
2.3
Diff
85:15
R1 CC
Round 1: Win vs Joshua Connop (Prism, Awakener of Sol) - Expected: 86:14
60:40
R2 CC
Round 2: Win vs Tsz Shing So (Aurora, Shooting Star) - Expected: 58:42
20:80
R3 CC
Round 3: Loss vs David Bruner (Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry) - Expected: 21:79
80:20
R4 CC
Round 4: Win vs Leonardo Poppa (Vynnset, Iron Maiden) - Expected: 78:22
Round 5: Win vs Dimitris Melissinos (Nuu, Alluring Desire) - Expected: 17:83, underdog victory
60:40
R6 CC
Round 6: Loss vs Diorge Brognara (Aurora, Shooting Star) - Expected: 58:42
Round 7: Loss vs Jakub Szczotka (Dorinthea Ironsong) - Expected: 71:29, favorite upset
Meta Fit
71% (5/7 favorable matchups)
Performance
+0.1 Wins (3.9 expected, 4 actual)
Surprise
3.1 total deviation
Difficulty
2.3 difficulty points
Round-by-Round Breakdown
Win probabilities rounded to nearest 5% for consistency with match display
Swipe left to see all columns →
| Round | Opponent | Expected | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | Prism, Awakener of Sol | 85% | Win |
| R2 | Aurora, Shooting Star | 60% | Win |
| R3 | Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry | 20% | Loss |
| R4 | Vynnset, Iron Maiden | 80% | Win |
| R5 | Nuu, Alluring Desire | 15% | Win |
| R6 | Aurora, Shooting Star | 60% | Loss |
| R7 | Dorinthea Ironsong | 70% | Loss |
dropped • 1-3-0
50%
Meta
-0.9
Perf
2.1
Surp
0.7
Diff
25:75
R1 CC
Round 1: Loss vs Rhys Francis (Florian, Rotwood Harbinger) - Expected: 27:73
Round 2: Win vs Lewis Westerman (Levia, Shadowborn Abomination) - Expected: 40:60, underdog victory
Round 3: Loss vs Eugenio Correa (Cindra, Dracai of Retribution) - Expected: 62:38, favorite upset
60:40
R4 CC
Round 4: Loss vs Bun Ar (Aurora, Shooting Star) - Expected: 58:42
Meta Fit
50% (2/4 favorable matchups)
Performance
-0.9 Wins (1.9 expected, 1 actual)
Surprise
2.1 total deviation
Difficulty
0.7 difficulty points
Round-by-Round Breakdown
Win probabilities rounded to nearest 5% for consistency with match display
Swipe left to see all columns →
| Round | Opponent | Expected | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | Florian, Rotwood Harbinger | 25% | Loss |
| R2 | Levia, Shadowborn Abomination | 40% | Win |
| R3 | Cindra, Dracai of Retribution | 60% | Loss |
| R4 | Aurora, Shooting Star | 60% | Loss |
dropped • 0-2-0
50%
Meta
-1.0
Perf
1.0
Surp
0.0
Diff
20:80
R1 CC
Round 1: Loss vs Donghee Kim (Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry) - Expected: 21:79
Round 2: Loss vs Léo Dupraz (Zen, Tamer of Purpose) - Expected: 74:26, favorite upset
Meta Fit
50% (1/2 favorable matchups)
Performance
-1.0 Wins (1.0 expected, 0 actual)
Surprise
1.0 total deviation
Difficulty
0.0 difficulty points
Round-by-Round Breakdown
Win probabilities rounded to nearest 5% for consistency with match display
Swipe left to see all columns →
| Round | Opponent | Expected | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry | 20% | Loss |
| R2 | Zen, Tamer of Purpose | 75% | Loss |
Legend
Win
Loss
Draw
Unknown Opponent
!
!!
Performance Metrics
Meta
% of rounds where the historical win rate favored you (≥50%). Higher means you faced a softer field.
Perf
Actual wins minus expected wins based on matchup odds. Positive = outperformed; negative = underperformed.
Surp
Sum of |result − win probability| per round. Near 0 means results matched expectations; higher means consistently surprising outcomes in either direction.
Diff
Win points weighted by matchup difficulty and round number (−log₂(prob) × round/total). Rewards beating long-shot matchups in late rounds.