Calling: London 2026 - Viserai (SAGE)

Viserai

6 players • Match results by round

Tip: Click any player row to see detailed round-by-round calculations

Magne Gjennestad

dropped • 3-4-0

100%

Meta

-0.5

Perf

3.5

Surp

2.0

Diff

R1 SAGE

Round 1: Loss vs Danny Halstad (Fai) - Expected: Not enough data (5 matches)

R2 SAGE

Round 2: Loss vs Kiran Lee (Dorinthea) - Expected: Not enough data (1 matches)

R3 SAGE

Round 3: Win vs Jose vicente Rodriguez Palazon (Nuu) - Expected: Not enough data (2 matches)

R4 SAGE

Round 4: Loss vs Brecht Van Reusel (Fai) - Expected: Not enough data (5 matches)

R5 SAGE

Round 5: Win vs Tom Cordrey (Pleiades) - Expected: Not enough data (1 matches)

R6 SAGE

Round 6: Win vs Oscar Magaldi (Lexi) - Expected: Not enough data (2 matches)

R7 SAGE

Round 7: Loss vs Gabriel Leeming (Olympia) - Expected: Not enough data (2 matches)

Meta Fit

100% (7/7 favorable matchups)

Performance

-0.5 Wins (3.5 expected, 3 actual)

Surprise

3.5 total deviation

Difficulty

2.0 difficulty points

Round-by-Round Breakdown

Win probabilities rounded to nearest 5% for consistency with match display

Swipe left to see all columns →

Round	Format	Opponent	Expected	Result	Meta	Surprise	Difficulty
R1	Silver Age	Fai	50%	Loss	✓	0.50	-
R2	Silver Age	Dorinthea	50%	Loss	✓	0.50	-
R3	Silver Age	Nuu	50%	Win	✓	0.50	0.43
R4	Silver Age	Fai	50%	Loss	✓	0.50	-
R5	Silver Age	Pleiades	50%	Win	✓	0.50	0.71
R6	Silver Age	Lexi	50%	Win	✓	0.50	0.86
R7	Silver Age	Olympia	50%	Loss	✓	0.50	-

Joshua Austin

dropped • 3-3-0

100%

Meta

0.0

Perf

3.0

Surp

1.3

Diff

R1 SAGE

Round 1: Win vs Jagreen Lern (Ira, Crimson Haze) - Expected: Not enough data (6 matches)

R2 SAGE

Round 2: Loss vs James Naylor (Ira, Crimson Haze) - Expected: Not enough data (6 matches)

R3 SAGE

Round 3: Win vs Patryk Gułaś (Enigma) - Expected: Not enough data (2 matches)

R4 SAGE

Round 4: Win vs Guillermo Regueiro (Enigma) - Expected: Not enough data (2 matches)

R5 SAGE

Round 5: Loss vs Matthew Kenworthy (Ira, Crimson Haze) - Expected: Not enough data (6 matches)

R6 SAGE

Round 6: Loss vs Valerie Tompkins (Bravo, Flattering Showman) - Expected: Not enough data (5 matches)

Meta Fit

100% (6/6 favorable matchups)

Performance

+0.0 Wins (3.0 expected, 3 actual)

Surprise

3.0 total deviation

Difficulty

1.3 difficulty points

Round-by-Round Breakdown

Win probabilities rounded to nearest 5% for consistency with match display

Swipe left to see all columns →

Round	Format	Opponent	Expected	Result	Meta	Surprise	Difficulty
R1	Silver Age	Ira, Crimson Haze	50%	Win	✓	0.50	0.17
R2	Silver Age	Ira, Crimson Haze	50%	Loss	✓	0.50	-
R3	Silver Age	Enigma	50%	Win	✓	0.50	0.50
R4	Silver Age	Enigma	50%	Win	✓	0.50	0.67
R5	Silver Age	Ira, Crimson Haze	50%	Loss	✓	0.50	-
R6	Silver Age	Bravo, Flattering Showman	50%	Loss	✓	0.50	-

Ryan McVean

dropped • 1-3-0

75%

Meta

-0.7

Perf

1.7

Surp

0.8

Diff

R1 SAGE

Round 1: Loss vs Daniel Buntrock (Fai) - Expected: Not enough data (5 matches)

R2 SAGE

Round 2: Loss vs Daniel Papež (Iyslander) - Expected: Not enough data (4 matches)

R3 SAGE

Round 3: Win vs Katy Pickburn (Aurora) - Expected: Not enough data (1 matches)

20:80

R4 SAGE

Round 4: Loss vs Nefra Greywulf (Briar) - Expected: 18:82

Meta Fit

75% (3/4 favorable matchups)

Performance

-0.7 Wins (1.7 expected, 1 actual)

Surprise

1.7 total deviation

Difficulty

0.8 difficulty points

Round-by-Round Breakdown

Win probabilities rounded to nearest 5% for consistency with match display

Swipe left to see all columns →

Round	Format	Opponent	Expected	Result	Meta	Surprise	Difficulty
R1	Silver Age	Fai	50%	Loss	✓	0.50	-
R2	Silver Age	Iyslander	50%	Loss	✓	0.50	-
R3	Silver Age	Aurora	50%	Win	✓	0.50	0.75
R4	Silver Age	Briar	20%	Loss	✗	0.18	-

Tim Coates

dropped • 0-4-0

75%

Meta

-1.7

Perf

1.7

Surp

0.0

Diff

R1 SAGE

Round 1: Loss vs robert john hall (Lyath Goldmane) - Expected: Not enough data (1 matches)

20:80

R2 SAGE

Round 2: Loss vs Tigran Grigorian (Briar) - Expected: 18:82

R3 SAGE

Round 3: Loss vs Ben Lux (Dromai) - Expected: Not enough data (2 matches)

R4 SAGE

Round 4: Loss vs Florian Kirsch (Kano) - Expected: Not enough data (1 matches)

Meta Fit

75% (3/4 favorable matchups)

Performance

-1.7 Wins (1.7 expected, 0 actual)

Surprise

1.7 total deviation

Difficulty

0.0 difficulty points

Round-by-Round Breakdown

Win probabilities rounded to nearest 5% for consistency with match display

Swipe left to see all columns →

Round	Format	Opponent	Expected	Result	Meta	Surprise	Difficulty
R1	Silver Age	Lyath Goldmane	50%	Loss	✓	0.50	-
R2	Silver Age	Briar	20%	Loss	✗	0.18	-
R3	Silver Age	Dromai	50%	Loss	✓	0.50	-
R4	Silver Age	Kano	50%	Loss	✓	0.50	-

Johnathan Carrillo

dropped • 0-1-0

Meta

-0.2

Perf

0.2

Surp

0.0

Diff

20:80

R1 SAGE

Round 1: Loss vs Clément Maillet (Briar) - Expected: 18:82

Meta Fit

0% (0/1 favorable matchups)

Performance

-0.2 Wins (0.2 expected, 0 actual)

Surprise

0.2 total deviation

Difficulty

0.0 difficulty points

Round-by-Round Breakdown

Win probabilities rounded to nearest 5% for consistency with match display

Swipe left to see all columns →

Round	Format	Opponent	Expected	Result	Meta	Surprise	Difficulty
R1	Silver Age	Briar	20%	Loss	✗	0.18	-

TCGTed Grabow

dropped • 0-1-0

100%

Meta

-0.5

Perf

0.5

Surp

0.0

Diff

R1 SAGE

Round 1: Loss vs Andrew Tan-mulligan (Bravo, Flattering Showman) - Expected: Not enough data (5 matches)

Meta Fit

100% (1/1 favorable matchups)

Performance

-0.5 Wins (0.5 expected, 0 actual)

Surprise

0.5 total deviation

Difficulty

0.0 difficulty points

Round-by-Round Breakdown

Win probabilities rounded to nearest 5% for consistency with match display

Swipe left to see all columns →

Round	Format	Opponent	Expected	Result	Meta	Surprise	Difficulty
R1	Silver Age	Bravo, Flattering Showman	50%	Loss	✓	0.50	-

Legend

Win

Loss

Draw

Unknown Opponent

Minor Surprise (10-19%)

Major Surprise (≥20%)

Performance Metrics

Meta

% of rounds where the historical win rate favored you (≥50%). Higher means you faced a softer field.

Perf

Actual wins minus expected wins based on matchup odds. Positive = outperformed; negative = underperformed.

Surp

Sum of |result − win probability| per round. Near 0 means results matched expectations; higher means consistently surprising outcomes in either direction.

Diff

Win points weighted by matchup difficulty and round number (−log₂(prob) × round/total). Rewards beating long-shot matchups in late rounds.