Levia at Calling: London 2026

Levia

3 players • Match results by round

Tip: Click any player row to see detailed round-by-round calculations

Kilian Schellekens

68th • 8-6-0

79%

Meta

+1.8

Perf

6.8

Surp

3.8

Diff

R1 SAGE

Round 1: Loss vs Patrick Jud (Lexi) - Expected: Not enough data (3 matches)

R2 SAGE

Round 2: Win vs Dylan Hammouti (Dromai) - Expected: Not enough data (2 matches)

R3 SAGE

Round 3: Win vs Victor Cardoso (Vynnset) - Expected: Not enough data (4 matches)

R4 SAGE

Round 4: Win vs John Zapata (Iyslander) - Expected: Not enough data (6 matches)

R5 SAGE

Round 5: Win vs Nguyen Giang (Dorinthea) - Expected: Not enough data (3 matches)

R6 SAGE

Round 6: Win vs Florin-Cristian Loghin (Fai) - Expected: Not enough data (9 matches)

R7 SAGE

Round 7: Win vs Giacomo Mosca (Olympia) - Expected: Not enough data (1 matches)

25:75

R8 SAGE

Round 8: Win vs Theo Maggs (Briar) - Expected: 25:75, underdog victory

R9 SAGE

Round 9: Loss vs Jose Alves (Vynnset) - Expected: Not enough data (4 matches)

R10

R10 SAGE

Round 10: Win vs Tim McCarthy (Kano) - Expected: Not enough data (6 matches)

R11

R11 SAGE

Round 11: Loss vs Bart de Jong (Terra) - Expected: Not enough data (2 matches)

25:75

R12 SAGE

Round 12: Loss vs Enes Findik (Briar) - Expected: 25:75

R13

R13 SAGE

Round 13: Loss vs Jean Luka Zorko (Enigma) - Expected: Not enough data (4 matches)

25:75

R14 SAGE

Round 14: Loss vs Alexandru Cucereanu (Briar) - Expected: 25:75

Meta Fit

79% (11/14 favorable matchups)

Performance

+1.8 Wins (6.2 expected, 8 actual)

Surprise

6.8 total deviation

Difficulty

3.8 difficulty points

Round-by-Round Breakdown

Win probabilities rounded to nearest 5% for consistency with match display

Swipe left to see all columns →

Round	Format	Opponent	Expected	Result	Meta	Surprise	Difficulty
R1	Silver Age	Lexi	50%	Loss	✓	0.50	-
R2	Silver Age	Dromai	50%	Win	✓	0.50	0.14
R3	Silver Age	Vynnset	50%	Win	✓	0.50	0.21
R4	Silver Age	Iyslander	50%	Win	✓	0.50	0.29
R5	Silver Age	Dorinthea	50%	Win	✓	0.50	0.36
R6	Silver Age	Fai	50%	Win	✓	0.50	0.43
R7	Silver Age	Olympia	50%	Win	✓	0.50	0.50
R8	Silver Age	Briar	25%	Win	✗	0.75	1.14
R9	Silver Age	Vynnset	50%	Loss	✓	0.50	-
R10	Silver Age	Kano	50%	Win	✓	0.50	0.71
R11	Silver Age	Terra	50%	Loss	✓	0.50	-
R12	Silver Age	Briar	25%	Loss	✗	0.25	-
R13	Silver Age	Enigma	50%	Loss	✓	0.50	-
R14	Silver Age	Briar	25%	Loss	✗	0.25	-

Tyler Harrod

dropped • 2-7-0

56%

Meta

-1.8

Perf

4.0

Surp

1.1

Diff

R1 SAGE

Round 1: Loss vs Ethan Cheyney (Enigma) - Expected: Not enough data (4 matches)

R2 SAGE

Round 2: Win vs Joel Rencen (Arakni, Web of Deceit) - Expected: Not enough data (3 matches)

25:75

R3 SAGE

Round 3: Loss vs Thomas Carreira (Briar) - Expected: 25:75

R4 SAGE

Round 4: Loss vs Ben McConnochie (Bravo, Flattering Showman) - Expected: Not enough data (4 matches)

R5 SAGE

Round 5: Loss vs Alexej Vollmer (Oscilio) - Expected: Not enough data (1 matches)

40:60

R6 SAGE

Round 6: Win vs Juliane Henning (Ira, Crimson Haze) - Expected: 38:62, underdog victory

40:60

R7 SAGE

Round 7: Loss vs Bader Altayyar (Ira, Crimson Haze) - Expected: 38:62

25:75

R8 SAGE

Round 8: Loss vs Steven Greenspan (Briar) - Expected: 25:75

R9 SAGE

Round 9: Loss vs Adrian Wilde (Terra) - Expected: Not enough data (2 matches)

Meta Fit

56% (5/9 favorable matchups)

Performance

-1.8 Wins (3.8 expected, 2 actual)

Surprise

4.0 total deviation

Difficulty

1.1 difficulty points

Round-by-Round Breakdown

Win probabilities rounded to nearest 5% for consistency with match display

Swipe left to see all columns →

Round	Format	Opponent	Expected	Result	Meta	Surprise	Difficulty
R1	Silver Age	Enigma	50%	Loss	✓	0.50	-
R2	Silver Age	Arakni, Web of Deceit	50%	Win	✓	0.50	0.22
R3	Silver Age	Briar	25%	Loss	✗	0.25	-
R4	Silver Age	Bravo, Flattering Showman	50%	Loss	✓	0.50	-
R5	Silver Age	Oscilio	50%	Loss	✓	0.50	-
R6	Silver Age	Ira, Crimson Haze	40%	Win	✗	0.62	0.92
R7	Silver Age	Ira, Crimson Haze	40%	Loss	✗	0.38	-
R8	Silver Age	Briar	25%	Loss	✗	0.25	-
R9	Silver Age	Terra	50%	Loss	✓	0.50	-

Tony Colonna-Cesari

dropped • 4-3-0

86%

Meta

+0.8

Perf

3.2

Surp

2.4

Diff

R1 SAGE

Round 1: Loss vs Julia B. (Bravo, Flattering Showman) - Expected: Not enough data (4 matches)

R2 SAGE

Round 2: Win vs Sebastien Lebaillif (Enigma) - Expected: Not enough data (4 matches)

R3 SAGE

Round 3: Loss vs Daniel Collett (Fai) - Expected: Not enough data (9 matches)

R4 SAGE

Round 4: Win vs Louise Roberts (Kayo, Berserker Runt) - Expected: Not enough data (1 matches)

R5 SAGE

Round 5: Win vs Shelby Ward (Dash) - Expected: Not enough data (2 matches)

R6 SAGE

Round 6: Win vs Pol Pérez Ribera (Fai) - Expected: Not enough data (9 matches)

25:75

R7 SAGE

Round 7: Loss vs Ed Cardall (Briar) - Expected: 25:75

Meta Fit

86% (6/7 favorable matchups)

Performance

+0.8 Wins (3.2 expected, 4 actual)

Surprise

3.2 total deviation

Difficulty

2.4 difficulty points

Round-by-Round Breakdown

Win probabilities rounded to nearest 5% for consistency with match display

Swipe left to see all columns →

Round	Format	Opponent	Expected	Result	Meta	Surprise	Difficulty
R1	Silver Age	Bravo, Flattering Showman	50%	Loss	✓	0.50	-
R2	Silver Age	Enigma	50%	Win	✓	0.50	0.29
R3	Silver Age	Fai	50%	Loss	✓	0.50	-
R4	Silver Age	Kayo, Berserker Runt	50%	Win	✓	0.50	0.57
R5	Silver Age	Dash	50%	Win	✓	0.50	0.71
R6	Silver Age	Fai	50%	Win	✓	0.50	0.86
R7	Silver Age	Briar	25%	Loss	✗	0.25	-

Legend

Win

Loss

Draw

Unknown Opponent

Minor Surprise (10-19%)

Major Surprise (≥20%)

Performance Metrics

Meta

% of rounds where the historical win rate favored you (≥50%). Higher means you faced a softer field.

Perf

Actual wins minus expected wins based on matchup odds. Positive = outperformed; negative = underperformed.

Surp

Sum of |result − win probability| per round. Near 0 means results matched expectations; higher means consistently surprising outcomes in either direction.

Diff

Win points weighted by matchup difficulty and round number (−log₂(prob) × round/total). Rewards beating long-shot matchups in late rounds.