Riptide at Calling: London 2026

Riptide

3 players • Match results by round

Tip: Click any player row to see detailed round-by-round calculations

Chris Karrandjas

dropped • 4-5-0

100%

Meta

-0.5

Perf

4.5

Surp

2.0

Diff

R1 SAGE

Round 1: Loss vs Alex Price (Bravo, Flattering Showman) - Expected: Not enough data (4 matches)

R2 SAGE

Round 2: Win vs Aaron Hadfield (Azalea) - Expected: Not enough data (1 matches)

R3 SAGE

Round 3: Loss vs Clément Maillet (Briar) - Expected: Not enough data (7 matches)

R4 SAGE

Round 4: Win vs Paolo Auria (Briar) - Expected: Not enough data (7 matches)

R5 SAGE

Round 5: Win vs Andrei Lazar (Arakni, Web of Deceit) - Expected: Not enough data (1 matches)

R6 SAGE

Round 6: Loss vs Adam Urban (Terra) - Expected: Not enough data (2 matches)

R7 SAGE

Round 7: Win vs Przemysław Smoleń (Briar) - Expected: Not enough data (7 matches)

R8 SAGE

Round 8: Loss vs Antonio Briola (Bravo, Flattering Showman) - Expected: Not enough data (4 matches)

R9 SAGE

Round 9: Loss vs Jack Warren (Ira, Crimson Haze) - Expected: Not enough data (3 matches)

Meta Fit

100% (9/9 favorable matchups)

Performance

-0.5 Wins (4.5 expected, 4 actual)

Surprise

4.5 total deviation

Difficulty

2.0 difficulty points

Round-by-Round Breakdown

Win probabilities rounded to nearest 5% for consistency with match display

Swipe left to see all columns →

Round	Format	Opponent	Expected	Result	Meta	Surprise	Difficulty
R1	Silver Age	Bravo, Flattering Showman	50%	Loss	✓	0.50	-
R2	Silver Age	Azalea	50%	Win	✓	0.50	0.22
R3	Silver Age	Briar	50%	Loss	✓	0.50	-
R4	Silver Age	Briar	50%	Win	✓	0.50	0.44
R5	Silver Age	Arakni, Web of Deceit	50%	Win	✓	0.50	0.56
R6	Silver Age	Terra	50%	Loss	✓	0.50	-
R7	Silver Age	Briar	50%	Win	✓	0.50	0.78
R8	Silver Age	Bravo, Flattering Showman	50%	Loss	✓	0.50	-
R9	Silver Age	Ira, Crimson Haze	50%	Loss	✓	0.50	-

Ross Chapman

dropped • 1-4-0

100%

Meta

-1.5

Perf

2.5

Surp

0.8

Diff

R1 SAGE

Round 1: Loss vs Warre Sevens (Kano) - Expected: Not enough data (1 matches)

R2 SAGE

Round 2: Loss vs Rob Thoen (Oldhim) - Expected: Not enough data (3 matches)

R3 SAGE

Round 3: Loss vs Jamie Alison (Terra) - Expected: Not enough data (2 matches)

R4 SAGE

Round 4: Win vs Louis Ades (Pleiades) - Expected: Not enough data (1 matches)

R5 SAGE

Round 5: Loss vs Paul A Wright (Enigma) - Expected: Not enough data (3 matches)

Meta Fit

100% (5/5 favorable matchups)

Performance

-1.5 Wins (2.5 expected, 1 actual)

Surprise

2.5 total deviation

Difficulty

0.8 difficulty points

Round-by-Round Breakdown

Win probabilities rounded to nearest 5% for consistency with match display

Swipe left to see all columns →

Round	Format	Opponent	Expected	Result	Meta	Surprise	Difficulty
R1	Silver Age	Kano	50%	Loss	✓	0.50	-
R2	Silver Age	Oldhim	50%	Loss	✓	0.50	-
R3	Silver Age	Terra	50%	Loss	✓	0.50	-
R4	Silver Age	Pleiades	50%	Win	✓	0.50	0.80
R5	Silver Age	Enigma	50%	Loss	✓	0.50	-

Kendal Cannon

dropped • 0-3-0

100%

Meta

-1.5

Perf

1.5

Surp

0.0

Diff

R1 SAGE

Round 1: Loss vs Alex Chițu (Dorinthea) - Expected: Not enough data (1 matches)

R2 SAGE

Round 2: Loss vs Anatoly Mukhin (Bravo, Flattering Showman) - Expected: Not enough data (4 matches)

R3 SAGE

Round 3: Loss vs Ralph Schlauri (Enigma) - Expected: Not enough data (3 matches)

Meta Fit

100% (3/3 favorable matchups)

Performance

-1.5 Wins (1.5 expected, 0 actual)

Surprise

1.5 total deviation

Difficulty

0.0 difficulty points

Round-by-Round Breakdown

Win probabilities rounded to nearest 5% for consistency with match display

Swipe left to see all columns →

Round	Format	Opponent	Expected	Result	Meta	Surprise	Difficulty
R1	Silver Age	Dorinthea	50%	Loss	✓	0.50	-
R2	Silver Age	Bravo, Flattering Showman	50%	Loss	✓	0.50	-
R3	Silver Age	Enigma	50%	Loss	✓	0.50	-

Legend

Win

Loss

Draw

Unknown Opponent

Minor Surprise (10-19%)

Major Surprise (≥20%)

Performance Metrics

Meta

% of rounds where the historical win rate favored you (≥50%). Higher means you faced a softer field.

Perf

Actual wins minus expected wins based on matchup odds. Positive = outperformed; negative = underperformed.

Surp

Sum of |result − win probability| per round. Near 0 means results matched expectations; higher means consistently surprising outcomes in either direction.

Diff

Win points weighted by matchup difficulty and round number (−log₂(prob) × round/total). Rewards beating long-shot matchups in late rounds.