Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

23 heroes • 374 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Enigma
Enigma
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
55.9%
+5.9%
Maxx 'The Hype' Nitro
Maxx 'The Hype' Nitro
Excellent
55.0%
+5.0%
Dash, Inventor Extraordinaire
Dash, Inventor Extraordinaire
Good
53.9%
+3.9%
Nuu, Alluring Desire
Nuu, Alluring Desire
Good
53.5%
+3.5%
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
Good
52.9%
+2.9%
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Good
52.5%
+2.5%
Kano, Dracai of Aether
Kano, Dracai of Aether
Neutral
52.0%
+2.0%
Dash I/O
Dash I/O
Neutral
50.4%
+0.4%
Azalea, Ace in the Hole
Azalea, Ace in the Hole
Neutral
48.7%
-1.3%
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
Neutral
48.5%
-1.5%
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
Neutral
48.2%
-1.8%
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
Poor
47.4%
-2.6%
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
Very Poor
44.8%
-5.2%
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
51% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
44.7%
-5.3%
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Very Poor
44.6%
-5.4%
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
Very Poor
43.7%
-6.3%
Uzuri, Switchblade
Uzuri, Switchblade
Very Poor
43.1%
-6.9%
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
Very Poor
41.9%
-8.1%
Zen
Zen
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
39.5%
-10.5%
Bravo, Showstopper
Bravo, Showstopper
20% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
38.3%
-11.7%
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Very Poor
36.8%
-13.2%
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
40% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
34.3%
-15.7%
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Very Poor
33.0%
-17.0%

Tournament Meta Summary

6
Well-Positioned Heroes
5
Neutral Heroes
12
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
46.2%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Highly diverse meta (6.6%)