Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

19 heroes • 427 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Lexi, Livewire
Lexi, Livewire
Excellent
59.8%
+9.8%
Iyslander, Stormbind
Iyslander, Stormbind
Good
54.7%
+4.7%
Dromai, Ash Artist
Dromai, Ash Artist
Good
53.6%
+3.6%
Briar, Warden of Thorns
Briar, Warden of Thorns
Good
52.2%
+2.2%
Uzuri, Switchblade
Uzuri, Switchblade
Neutral
51.9%
+1.9%
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Neutral
50.6%
+0.6%
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
53% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
50.6%
+0.6%
Bravo, Showstopper
Bravo, Showstopper
Neutral
50.4%
+0.4%
Azalea, Ace in the Hole
Azalea, Ace in the Hole
Neutral
48.3%
-1.7%
Kano, Dracai of Aether
Kano, Dracai of Aether
52% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
47.2%
-2.8%
Katsu, the Wanderer
Katsu, the Wanderer
Poor
47.0%
-3.0%
Viserai, Rune Blood
Viserai, Rune Blood
Poor
46.9%
-3.1%
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
Very Poor
44.8%
-5.2%
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
Very Poor
44.5%
-5.5%
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
44% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
41.3%
-8.7%
Dash, Inventor Extraordinaire
Dash, Inventor Extraordinaire
Very Poor
39.8%
-10.2%
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
35.2%
-14.8%
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Very Poor
33.9%
-16.1%
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Prism, Awakener of Sol
43% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
30.5%
-19.5%

Tournament Meta Summary

4
Well-Positioned Heroes
5
Neutral Heroes
10
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
46.5%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Highly diverse meta (7.4%)