Calling: Manila

Philippines

CC
228
11 rounds + Top Cut

Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

23 heroes • 226 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Viserai, Rune Blood
Viserai, Rune Blood
Excellent
57.2%
+7.2%
Nuu, Alluring Desire
Nuu, Alluring Desire
Excellent
55.8%
+5.8%
Dash, Inventor Extraordinaire
Dash, Inventor Extraordinaire
Good
54.1%
+4.1%
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
Good
53.7%
+3.7%
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
Good
53.4%
+3.4%
Kano, Dracai of Aether
Kano, Dracai of Aether
Good
52.4%
+2.4%
Dash I/O
Dash I/O
Neutral
51.8%
+1.8%
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Neutral
49.6%
-0.4%
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Neutral
48.8%
-1.2%
Uzuri, Switchblade
Uzuri, Switchblade
Neutral
48.7%
-1.3%
Azalea, Ace in the Hole
Azalea, Ace in the Hole
Poor
47.7%
-2.3%
Maxx 'The Hype' Nitro
Maxx 'The Hype' Nitro
Poor
47.6%
-2.4%
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
Poor
47.6%
-2.4%
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Poor
47.4%
-2.6%
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Poor
46.3%
-3.7%
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Poor
45.8%
-4.2%
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
Poor
45.1%
-4.9%
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
Very Poor
44.9%
-5.1%
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
Very Poor
44.5%
-5.5%
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
Very Poor
42.8%
-7.2%
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
60% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
37.2%
-12.8%
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Very Poor
35.5%
-14.5%
Olympia, Prized Fighter
Olympia, Prized Fighter
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
33.5%
-16.5%

Tournament Meta Summary

6
Well-Positioned Heroes
4
Neutral Heroes
13
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
47.5%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Moderately diverse meta (6.0%)