Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

32 heroes • 338 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
54% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
61.9%
+11.9%
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Excellent
58.1%
+8.1%
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Fai, Rising Rebellion
58% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
57.0%
+7.0%
Arakni, Huntsman
Arakni, Huntsman
16% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
56.6%
+6.6%
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Excellent
56.6%
+6.6%
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
58% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
55.6%
+5.6%
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
9% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
55.2%
+5.2%
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
Good
53.5%
+3.5%
Jarl Vetreiði
Jarl Vetreiði
Good
52.8%
+2.8%
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
35% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
52.7%
+2.7%
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
52.2%
+2.2%
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
50% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
50.9%
+0.9%
Puffin, Hightail
Puffin, Hightail
8% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
49.1%
-0.9%
Katsu, the Wanderer
Katsu, the Wanderer
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
48.4%
-1.6%
Pleiades, Superstar
Pleiades, Superstar
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
47.7%
-2.3%
Aurora, Legacy of Tempest
Aurora, Legacy of Tempest
27% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
47.7%
-2.3%
Betsy, Skin in the Game
Betsy, Skin in the Game
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
47.6%
-2.4%
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
45% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
47.3%
-2.7%
Valda, Seismic Impact
Valda, Seismic Impact
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
46.9%
-3.1%
Zyggy Starlight
Zyggy Starlight
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
46.1%
-3.9%
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
45.0%
-5.0%
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
44.6%
-5.4%
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
25% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
41.1%
-8.9%
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
40.6%
-9.4%
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
38.8%
-11.2%
Oscilio, Forked Continuum
Oscilio, Forked Continuum
10% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
38.0%
-12.0%
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
36.8%
-13.2%
Viserai, the Forsaken
Viserai, the Forsaken
34% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
32.7%
-17.3%
Hala, Bladesaint of the Vow
Hala, Bladesaint of the Vow
9% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
32.2%
-17.8%
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
21% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
29.8%
-20.2%
Maxx 'The Hype' Nitro
Maxx 'The Hype' Nitro
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
27.2%
-22.8%
Malice, Domina of the Dead
Malice, Domina of the Dead
8% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
22.3%
-27.7%

Tournament Meta Summary

11
Well-Positioned Heroes
3
Neutral Heroes
18
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
46.0%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Highly diverse meta (9.6%)