Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

35 heroes • 477 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Excellent
58.5%
+8.5%
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
45% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
54.2%
+4.2%
Katsu, the Wanderer
Katsu, the Wanderer
44% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
53.5%
+3.5%
Betsy, Skin in the Game
Betsy, Skin in the Game
Good
53.5%
+3.5%
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
26% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
53.0%
+3.0%
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
Good
52.9%
+2.9%
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Good
52.5%
+2.5%
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Neutral
51.9%
+1.9%
Arakni, Huntsman
Arakni, Huntsman
Neutral
51.6%
+1.6%
Dash I/O
Dash I/O
Neutral
51.4%
+1.4%
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Neutral
50.9%
+0.9%
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
Neutral
50.9%
+0.9%
Aurora, Legacy of Tempest
Aurora, Legacy of Tempest
Neutral
50.8%
+0.8%
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
Neutral
49.5%
-0.5%
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
44% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
49.4%
-0.6%
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Neutral
49.3%
-0.7%
Zyggy Starlight
Zyggy Starlight
Neutral
49.2%
-0.8%
Jarl Vetreiði
Jarl Vetreiði
Neutral
48.3%
-1.7%
Olympia, Prized Fighter
Olympia, Prized Fighter
38% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
47.5%
-2.5%
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Fang, Dracai of Blades
51% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
47.4%
-2.6%
Hala, Bladesaint of the Vow
Hala, Bladesaint of the Vow
Poor
47.3%
-2.7%
Puffin, Hightail
Puffin, Hightail
Poor
46.3%
-3.7%
Uzuri, Switchblade
Uzuri, Switchblade
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
46.3%
-3.7%
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Poor
45.5%
-4.5%
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
52% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
44.1%
-5.9%
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
31% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
44.1%
-5.9%
Bravo, Showstopper
Bravo, Showstopper
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
42.6%
-7.4%
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
36% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
42.3%
-7.7%
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
15% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
41.4%
-8.6%
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Very Poor
41.1%
-8.9%
Valda, Seismic Impact
Valda, Seismic Impact
Very Poor
40.9%
-9.1%
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
40.9%
-9.1%
Maxx 'The Hype' Nitro
Maxx 'The Hype' Nitro
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
40.6%
-9.4%
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
36% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
34.6%
-15.4%
Pleiades, Superstar
Pleiades, Superstar
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
29.4%
-20.6%

Tournament Meta Summary

7
Well-Positioned Heroes
11
Neutral Heroes
17
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
47.2%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Moderately diverse meta (5.9%)