Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

22 heroes • 69 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Excellent
63.8%
+13.8%
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Excellent
55.6%
+5.6%
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Good
54.3%
+4.3%
Jarl Vetreiði
Jarl Vetreiði
Good
54.2%
+4.2%
Dash I/O
Dash I/O
Good
53.8%
+3.8%
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
Good
53.6%
+3.6%
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Good
52.8%
+2.8%
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Neutral
51.9%
+1.9%
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Neutral
51.7%
+1.7%
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
Neutral
50.0%
-0.0%
Puffin, Hightail
Puffin, Hightail
Neutral
49.8%
-0.2%
Katsu, the Wanderer
Katsu, the Wanderer
Neutral
49.7%
-0.3%
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
47.2%
-2.8%
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Poor
46.4%
-3.6%
Zyggy Starlight
Zyggy Starlight
Poor
45.2%
-4.8%
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
59% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
44.8%
-5.2%
Hala, Bladesaint of the Vow
Hala, Bladesaint of the Vow
59% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
43.6%
-6.4%
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Very Poor
43.6%
-6.4%
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
50% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
39.3%
-10.7%
Aurora, Legacy of Tempest
Aurora, Legacy of Tempest
Very Poor
38.4%
-11.6%
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
26% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
35.9%
-14.1%
Pleiades, Superstar
Pleiades, Superstar
22% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
34.1%
-15.9%

Tournament Meta Summary

7
Well-Positioned Heroes
5
Neutral Heroes
10
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
48.2%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Highly diverse meta (7.0%)