Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

30 heroes • 98 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Excellent
57.3%
+7.3%
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Excellent
55.6%
+5.6%
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Good
54.8%
+4.8%
Valda, Seismic Impact
Valda, Seismic Impact
Good
54.4%
+4.4%
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Good
54.3%
+4.3%
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
Good
52.9%
+2.9%
Jarl Vetreiði
Jarl Vetreiði
Good
52.5%
+2.5%
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Good
52.5%
+2.5%
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
Good
52.1%
+2.1%
Arakni, Huntsman
Arakni, Huntsman
Neutral
51.8%
+1.8%
Dash I/O
Dash I/O
Neutral
51.3%
+1.3%
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Neutral
50.7%
+0.7%
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
50.6%
+0.6%
Puffin, Hightail
Puffin, Hightail
Neutral
49.5%
-0.5%
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
Neutral
49.4%
-0.6%
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Neutral
49.2%
-0.8%
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
Neutral
48.6%
-1.4%
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Neutral
48.4%
-1.6%
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Poor
47.9%
-2.1%
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Poor
47.4%
-2.6%
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
56% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
46.9%
-3.1%
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
Poor
46.1%
-3.9%
Katsu, the Wanderer
Katsu, the Wanderer
Very Poor
43.9%
-6.1%
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Very Poor
43.7%
-6.3%
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
Very Poor
43.6%
-6.4%
Aurora, Legacy of Tempest
Aurora, Legacy of Tempest
Very Poor
42.1%
-7.9%
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
43% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
41.0%
-9.0%
Zyggy Starlight
Zyggy Starlight
Very Poor
40.2%
-9.8%
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
46% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
38.1%
-11.9%
Oscilio, Forked Continuum
Oscilio, Forked Continuum
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
32.1%
-17.9%

Tournament Meta Summary

9
Well-Positioned Heroes
9
Neutral Heroes
12
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
48.3%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Moderately diverse meta (5.6%)