Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

26 heroes • 81 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Excellent
60.7%
+10.7%
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Excellent
59.3%
+9.3%
Jarl Vetreiði
Jarl Vetreiði
Good
55.0%
+5.0%
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Good
52.8%
+2.8%
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Good
52.5%
+2.5%
Arakni, Huntsman
Arakni, Huntsman
Good
52.3%
+2.3%
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
Good
52.2%
+2.2%
Valda, Seismic Impact
Valda, Seismic Impact
Good
52.0%
+2.0%
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
Neutral
50.1%
+0.1%
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Neutral
49.7%
-0.3%
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Neutral
48.7%
-1.3%
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
Neutral
48.4%
-1.6%
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Neutral
48.4%
-1.6%
Dash I/O
Dash I/O
Neutral
48.4%
-1.6%
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
Poor
46.1%
-3.9%
Puffin, Hightail
Puffin, Hightail
Poor
45.9%
-4.1%
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Poor
45.8%
-4.2%
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
Poor
45.2%
-4.8%
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Very Poor
45.0%
-5.0%
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Very Poor
44.6%
-5.4%
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Very Poor
43.9%
-6.1%
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
48% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
43.0%
-7.0%
Katsu, the Wanderer
Katsu, the Wanderer
Very Poor
43.0%
-7.0%
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
Very Poor
42.4%
-7.6%
Hala, Bladesaint of the Vow
Hala, Bladesaint of the Vow
Very Poor
34.6%
-15.4%
Oscilio, Forked Continuum
Oscilio, Forked Continuum
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
31.1%
-18.9%

Tournament Meta Summary

8
Well-Positioned Heroes
6
Neutral Heroes
12
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
47.7%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Highly diverse meta (6.3%)