Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

32 heroes • 760 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Excellent
58.4%
+8.4%
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Good
53.3%
+3.3%
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
Good
53.2%
+3.2%
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Good
52.6%
+2.6%
Arakni, Huntsman
Arakni, Huntsman
Neutral
51.8%
+1.8%
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Neutral
51.2%
+1.2%
Valda, Seismic Impact
Valda, Seismic Impact
Neutral
50.6%
+0.6%
Jarl Vetreiði
Jarl Vetreiði
Neutral
50.3%
+0.3%
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Neutral
50.2%
+0.2%
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
Neutral
49.6%
-0.4%
Dash I/O
Dash I/O
Neutral
48.2%
-1.8%
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Neutral
48.1%
-1.9%
Betsy, Skin in the Game
Betsy, Skin in the Game
52% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
47.2%
-2.8%
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
Poor
47.0%
-3.0%
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
Poor
46.9%
-3.1%
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
Poor
46.0%
-4.0%
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Poor
45.9%
-4.1%
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
57% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
45.6%
-4.4%
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Poor
45.3%
-4.7%
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
Very Poor
44.9%
-5.1%
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Very Poor
44.9%
-5.1%
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Very Poor
44.8%
-5.2%
Puffin, Hightail
Puffin, Hightail
Very Poor
44.3%
-5.7%
Katsu, the Wanderer
Katsu, the Wanderer
Very Poor
44.0%
-6.0%
Pleiades, Superstar
Pleiades, Superstar
Very Poor
43.6%
-6.4%
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Very Poor
43.4%
-6.6%
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
53% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
40.5%
-9.5%
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
52% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
40.1%
-9.9%
Uzuri, Switchblade
Uzuri, Switchblade
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
40.0%
-10.0%
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
Very Poor
38.7%
-11.3%
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
Very Poor
34.0%
-16.0%
Olympia, Prized Fighter
Olympia, Prized Fighter
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
27.6%
-22.4%

Tournament Meta Summary

4
Well-Positioned Heroes
8
Neutral Heroes
20
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
46.0%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Moderately diverse meta (5.9%)