Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

33 heroes • 280 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Excellent
57.6%
+7.6%
Arakni, Huntsman
Arakni, Huntsman
Excellent
56.5%
+6.5%
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
Excellent
56.2%
+6.2%
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
Excellent
55.3%
+5.3%
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Good
54.3%
+4.3%
Dash I/O
Dash I/O
Good
52.1%
+2.1%
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
Good
52.1%
+2.1%
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Neutral
51.9%
+1.9%
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Neutral
51.9%
+1.9%
Jarl Vetreiði
Jarl Vetreiði
Neutral
51.1%
+1.1%
Katsu, the Wanderer
Katsu, the Wanderer
Neutral
50.7%
+0.7%
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
Neutral
50.6%
+0.6%
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Neutral
49.6%
-0.4%
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Neutral
49.4%
-0.6%
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Neutral
49.0%
-1.0%
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
Neutral
48.6%
-1.4%
Pleiades, Superstar
Pleiades, Superstar
53% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
48.3%
-1.7%
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Poor
47.9%
-2.1%
Valda, Seismic Impact
Valda, Seismic Impact
Poor
47.8%
-2.2%
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
Poor
45.9%
-4.1%
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
56% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
45.2%
-4.8%
Puffin, Hightail
Puffin, Hightail
59% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
44.1%
-5.9%
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
20% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
43.7%
-6.3%
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
38% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
43.1%
-6.9%
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Very Poor
43.0%
-7.0%
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
Very Poor
41.7%
-8.3%
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Fang, Dracai of Blades
59% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
39.2%
-10.8%
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
49% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
39.2%
-10.8%
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
32% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
35.5%
-14.5%
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
33.8%
-16.2%
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
24% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
32.9%
-17.1%
Olympia, Prized Fighter
Olympia, Prized Fighter
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
32.5%
-17.5%
Maxx 'The Hype' Nitro
Maxx 'The Hype' Nitro
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
24.7%
-25.3%

Tournament Meta Summary

7
Well-Positioned Heroes
10
Neutral Heroes
16
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
46.2%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Highly diverse meta (7.7%)