Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

9 heroes • 13 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Briar, Warden of Thorns
Briar, Warden of Thorns
30% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
60.5%
+10.5%
Bravo, Star of the Show
Bravo, Star of the Show
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
59.4%
+9.4%
Iyslander, Stormbind
Iyslander, Stormbind
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
56.9%
+6.9%
Dromai, Ash Artist
Dromai, Ash Artist
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
51.2%
+1.2%
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
27% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
50.8%
+0.8%
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
50.0%
+0.0%
Dash I/O
Dash I/O
25% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
49.6%
-0.4%
Prism, Sculptor of Arc Light
Prism, Sculptor of Arc Light
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
30.8%
-19.2%
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
16.7%
-33.3%

Tournament Meta Summary

3
Well-Positioned Heroes
4
Neutral Heroes
2
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
47.3%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Highly diverse meta (13.6%)