Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

14 heroes • 25 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
Excellent
66.2%
+16.2%
Kayo
Kayo
47% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
60.4%
+10.4%
Data Doll MKII
Data Doll MKII
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
57.3%
+7.3%
Dash, Database
Dash, Database
43% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
55.6%
+5.6%
Aurora
Aurora
38% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
51.9%
+1.9%
Verdance
Verdance
46% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
49.4%
-0.6%
Prism, Advent of Thrones
Prism, Advent of Thrones
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
49.3%
-0.7%
Blaze, Firemind
Blaze, Firemind
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
47.6%
-2.4%
Cindra
Cindra
41% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
44.8%
-5.2%
Enigma, New Moon
Enigma, New Moon
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
44.6%
-5.4%
Terra
Terra
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
44.1%
-5.9%
Puffin
Puffin
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
39.9%
-10.1%
Dorinthea, Quicksilver Prodigy
Dorinthea, Quicksilver Prodigy
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
32.6%
-17.4%
Fai
Fai
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
16.7%
-33.3%

Tournament Meta Summary

4
Well-Positioned Heroes
3
Neutral Heroes
7
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
47.2%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Highly diverse meta (11.8%)