Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

25 heroes • 97 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
Excellent
58.6%
+8.6%
Kano, Dracai of Aether
Kano, Dracai of Aether
Excellent
57.5%
+7.5%
Viserai, Rune Blood
Viserai, Rune Blood
Excellent
56.7%
+6.7%
Nuu, Alluring Desire
Nuu, Alluring Desire
Excellent
55.9%
+5.9%
Aurora, Shooting Star
Aurora, Shooting Star
Excellent
55.1%
+5.1%
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
Good
53.8%
+3.8%
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Neutral
51.5%
+1.5%
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Neutral
51.4%
+1.4%
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
Neutral
50.8%
+0.8%
Dash I/O
Dash I/O
Neutral
50.4%
+0.4%
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
Neutral
48.0%
-2.0%
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Poor
47.4%
-2.6%
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
Poor
47.3%
-2.7%
Jarl Vetreiði
Jarl Vetreiði
Poor
47.3%
-2.7%
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Poor
46.5%
-3.5%
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Poor
46.0%
-4.0%
Azalea, Ace in the Hole
Azalea, Ace in the Hole
Poor
45.6%
-4.4%
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Poor
45.3%
-4.7%
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
Very Poor
44.7%
-5.3%
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Very Poor
43.7%
-6.3%
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
Very Poor
38.7%
-11.3%
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
Very Poor
37.1%
-12.9%
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Very Poor
34.6%
-15.4%
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
Very Poor
34.1%
-15.9%
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
Very Poor
32.4%
-17.6%

Tournament Meta Summary

6
Well-Positioned Heroes
5
Neutral Heroes
14
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
47.2%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Highly diverse meta (7.3%)