Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

29 heroes • 85 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Kano, Dracai of Aether
Kano, Dracai of Aether
Excellent
63.6%
+13.6%
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
Excellent
62.4%
+12.4%
Viserai, Rune Blood
Viserai, Rune Blood
Excellent
60.2%
+10.2%
Nuu, Alluring Desire
Nuu, Alluring Desire
Excellent
58.5%
+8.5%
Aurora, Shooting Star
Aurora, Shooting Star
Excellent
57.9%
+7.9%
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
Excellent
55.4%
+5.4%
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
Good
54.0%
+4.0%
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Good
53.8%
+3.8%
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Good
53.0%
+3.0%
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
Good
52.5%
+2.5%
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
Neutral
51.7%
+1.7%
Dash I/O
Dash I/O
Neutral
50.4%
+0.4%
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
26% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
49.1%
-0.9%
Azalea, Ace in the Hole
Azalea, Ace in the Hole
Neutral
48.5%
-1.5%
Jarl Vetreiði
Jarl Vetreiði
Neutral
48.3%
-1.7%
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
58% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
48.1%
-1.9%
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Neutral
48.1%
-1.9%
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Poor
48.0%
-2.0%
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
Poor
47.2%
-2.8%
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Poor
47.0%
-3.0%
Arakni, Huntsman
Arakni, Huntsman
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
45.2%
-4.8%
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Very Poor
44.4%
-5.6%
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
Very Poor
41.9%
-8.1%
Dash, Inventor Extraordinaire
Dash, Inventor Extraordinaire
20% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
40.2%
-9.8%
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
21% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
37.3%
-12.7%
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
33% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
37.1%
-12.9%
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
52% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
35.4%
-14.6%
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Fai, Rising Rebellion
16% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
33.4%
-16.6%
Katsu, the Wanderer
Katsu, the Wanderer
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
31.5%
-18.5%

Tournament Meta Summary

10
Well-Positioned Heroes
7
Neutral Heroes
12
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
48.4%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Highly diverse meta (8.3%)