Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

31 heroes • 322 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Kano, Dracai of Aether
Kano, Dracai of Aether
Excellent
60.9%
+10.9%
Viserai, Rune Blood
Viserai, Rune Blood
Excellent
57.6%
+7.6%
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
Excellent
56.8%
+6.8%
Aurora, Shooting Star
Aurora, Shooting Star
Good
54.9%
+4.9%
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
Good
53.5%
+3.5%
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
Good
53.2%
+3.2%
Nuu, Alluring Desire
Nuu, Alluring Desire
Good
52.3%
+2.3%
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Neutral
51.6%
+1.6%
Dash I/O
Dash I/O
Neutral
51.1%
+1.1%
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
Neutral
51.0%
+1.0%
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Neutral
49.1%
-0.9%
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Neutral
48.7%
-1.3%
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
Neutral
48.3%
-1.7%
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Poor
45.8%
-4.2%
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Very Poor
44.8%
-5.2%
Azalea, Ace in the Hole
Azalea, Ace in the Hole
Very Poor
44.8%
-5.2%
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
30% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
43.9%
-6.1%
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
Very Poor
43.6%
-6.4%
Bravo, Showstopper
Bravo, Showstopper
6% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
43.6%
-6.4%
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Very Poor
43.5%
-6.5%
Jarl Vetreiði
Jarl Vetreiði
Very Poor
43.0%
-7.0%
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Very Poor
42.5%
-7.5%
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Very Poor
42.4%
-7.6%
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
59% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
42.3%
-7.7%
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Kassai of the Golden Sand
40% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
41.5%
-8.5%
Dash, Inventor Extraordinaire
Dash, Inventor Extraordinaire
26% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
37.9%
-12.1%
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
Very Poor
34.8%
-15.2%
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Fai, Rising Rebellion
20% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
34.2%
-15.8%
Uzuri, Switchblade
Uzuri, Switchblade
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
29.5%
-20.5%
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
26% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
29.4%
-20.6%
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
43% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
29.3%
-20.7%

Tournament Meta Summary

7
Well-Positioned Heroes
6
Neutral Heroes
18
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
45.3%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Highly diverse meta (8.1%)