Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

18 heroes • 77 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Bravo, Star of the Show
Bravo, Star of the Show
Excellent
65.6%
+15.6%
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
19% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
58.8%
+8.8%
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
44% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
55.9%
+5.9%
Briar, Warden of Thorns
Briar, Warden of Thorns
Excellent
55.7%
+5.7%
Prism, Sculptor of Arc Light
Prism, Sculptor of Arc Light
55% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
55.4%
+5.4%
Chane, Bound by Shadow
Chane, Bound by Shadow
Excellent
55.2%
+5.2%
Viserai, Rune Blood
Viserai, Rune Blood
Good
54.3%
+4.3%
Dromai, Ash Artist
Dromai, Ash Artist
32% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
50.2%
+0.2%
Aurora, Shooting Star
Aurora, Shooting Star
46% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
47.6%
-2.4%
Dash I/O
Dash I/O
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
45.9%
-4.1%
Nuu, Alluring Desire
Nuu, Alluring Desire
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
43.0%
-7.0%
Oldhim, Grandfather of Eternity
Oldhim, Grandfather of Eternity
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
42.2%
-7.8%
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Prism, Awakener of Sol
12% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
41.6%
-8.4%
Iyslander, Stormbind
Iyslander, Stormbind
14% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
40.6%
-9.4%
Kano, Dracai of Aether
Kano, Dracai of Aether
26% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
39.7%
-10.3%
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Fai, Rising Rebellion
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
35.5%
-14.5%
Lexi, Livewire
Lexi, Livewire
15% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
34.1%
-15.9%
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
30.6%
-19.4%

Tournament Meta Summary

7
Well-Positioned Heroes
1
Neutral Heroes
10
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
47.3%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Highly diverse meta (9.3%)