Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

22 heroes • 95 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Viserai, Rune Blood
Viserai, Rune Blood
Excellent
56.6%
+6.6%
Nuu, Alluring Desire
Nuu, Alluring Desire
Excellent
56.3%
+6.3%
Bravo, Showstopper
Bravo, Showstopper
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
54.0%
+4.0%
Dash I/O
Dash I/O
Good
53.8%
+3.8%
Aurora, Shooting Star
Aurora, Shooting Star
Good
53.4%
+3.4%
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
Good
52.9%
+2.9%
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
Good
52.5%
+2.5%
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
Good
52.1%
+2.1%
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
Neutral
49.7%
-0.3%
Maxx 'The Hype' Nitro
Maxx 'The Hype' Nitro
13% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
48.4%
-1.6%
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Neutral
48.4%
-1.6%
Azalea, Ace in the Hole
Azalea, Ace in the Hole
Neutral
48.2%
-1.8%
Uzuri, Switchblade
Uzuri, Switchblade
31% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
46.4%
-3.6%
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
Poor
45.4%
-4.6%
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Poor
45.4%
-4.6%
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Very Poor
44.9%
-5.1%
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
Very Poor
43.4%
-6.6%
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
60% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
42.9%
-7.1%
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
Very Poor
42.8%
-7.2%
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
Very Poor
40.5%
-9.5%
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
52% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
33.2%
-16.8%
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Fai, Rising Rebellion
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
29.8%
-20.2%

Tournament Meta Summary

8
Well-Positioned Heroes
4
Neutral Heroes
10
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
47.3%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Highly diverse meta (6.8%)