Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

19 heroes • 643 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Oldhim, Grandfather of Eternity
Oldhim, Grandfather of Eternity
Excellent
58.0%
+8.0%
Lexi, Livewire
Lexi, Livewire
Excellent
56.2%
+6.2%
Iyslander, Stormbind
Iyslander, Stormbind
Good
54.0%
+4.0%
Briar, Warden of Thorns
Briar, Warden of Thorns
Neutral
50.4%
+0.4%
Dromai, Ash Artist
Dromai, Ash Artist
Neutral
49.8%
-0.2%
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Neutral
49.3%
-0.7%
Bravo, Showstopper
Bravo, Showstopper
Neutral
49.0%
-1.0%
Katsu, the Wanderer
Katsu, the Wanderer
Neutral
49.0%
-1.0%
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
21% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
48.1%
-1.9%
Kano, Dracai of Aether
Kano, Dracai of Aether
Poor
47.6%
-2.4%
Dash, Inventor Extraordinaire
Dash, Inventor Extraordinaire
Poor
47.3%
-2.7%
Azalea, Ace in the Hole
Azalea, Ace in the Hole
Poor
46.9%
-3.1%
Viserai, Rune Blood
Viserai, Rune Blood
Poor
45.7%
-4.3%
Uzuri, Switchblade
Uzuri, Switchblade
Very Poor
42.8%
-7.2%
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Very Poor
42.4%
-7.6%
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
Very Poor
40.5%
-9.5%
Arakni, Huntsman
Arakni, Huntsman
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
40.2%
-9.8%
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
41% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
38.1%
-11.9%
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
45% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
33.8%
-16.2%

Tournament Meta Summary

3
Well-Positioned Heroes
6
Neutral Heroes
10
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
46.8%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Moderately diverse meta (5.9%)