Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

22 heroes • 57 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Ira, Crimson Haze
Ira, Crimson Haze
35% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
62.3%
+12.3%
Bravo, Flattering Showman
Bravo, Flattering Showman
29% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
60.5%
+10.5%
Victor Goldmane
Victor Goldmane
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
58.0%
+8.0%
Olympia
Olympia
10% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
56.5%
+6.5%
Riptide
Riptide
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
54.7%
+4.7%
Enigma
Enigma
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
53.0%
+3.0%
Dorinthea
Dorinthea
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
52.3%
+2.3%
Dromai
Dromai
9% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
51.8%
+1.8%
Lexi
Lexi
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
51.3%
+1.3%
Kano
Kano
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
50.1%
+0.1%
Zyggy
Zyggy
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
49.1%
-0.9%
Levia
Levia
52% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
47.7%
-2.3%
Iyslander
Iyslander
20% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
46.7%
-3.3%
Dorinthea, Quicksilver Prodigy
Dorinthea, Quicksilver Prodigy
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
46.4%
-3.6%
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
43.9%
-6.1%
Hala
Hala
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
43.6%
-6.4%
Azalea
Azalea
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
41.7%
-8.3%
Fai
Fai
21% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
41.3%
-8.7%
Fang
Fang
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
41.1%
-8.9%
Kayo
Kayo
11% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
39.8%
-10.2%
Aurora
Aurora
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
39.6%
-10.4%
Pleiades
Pleiades
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
34.8%
-15.2%

Tournament Meta Summary

7
Well-Positioned Heroes
4
Neutral Heroes
11
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
48.5%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Highly diverse meta (7.2%)