Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

22 heroes • 71 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Levia
Levia
16% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
58.2%
+8.2%
Ira, Crimson Haze
Ira, Crimson Haze
13% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
57.8%
+7.8%
Riptide
Riptide
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
57.3%
+7.3%
Enigma
Enigma
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
55.1%
+5.1%
Lexi
Lexi
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
55.0%
+5.0%
Olympia
Olympia
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
52.9%
+2.9%
Dromai
Dromai
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
52.7%
+2.7%
Kayo
Kayo
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
52.0%
+2.0%
Vynnset
Vynnset
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
51.4%
+1.4%
Iyslander
Iyslander
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
50.0%
+0.0%
Florian
Florian
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
49.3%
-0.7%
Bravo, Flattering Showman
Bravo, Flattering Showman
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
48.7%
-1.3%
Dorinthea
Dorinthea
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
45.8%
-4.2%
Prism
Prism
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
45.7%
-4.3%
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
45.0%
-5.0%
Viserai, Between Worlds
Viserai, Between Worlds
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
43.8%
-6.2%
Scurv, Stowaway
Scurv, Stowaway
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
42.1%
-7.9%
Fai
Fai
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
41.9%
-8.1%
Baalghor, Omen of the End
Baalghor, Omen of the End
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
40.0%
-10.0%
Dash
Dash
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
39.1%
-10.9%
Hala
Hala
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
38.4%
-11.6%
Rhinar
Rhinar
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
30.4%
-19.6%

Tournament Meta Summary

7
Well-Positioned Heroes
5
Neutral Heroes
10
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
47.9%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Highly diverse meta (7.1%)