Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

22 heroes • 62 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Oscilio
Oscilio
Excellent
60.9%
+10.9%
Enigma
Enigma
Excellent
58.1%
+8.1%
Dromai
Dromai
Excellent
57.2%
+7.2%
Oldhim
Oldhim
Excellent
56.9%
+6.9%
Fai
Fai
Neutral
51.2%
+1.2%
Briar
Briar
Neutral
50.3%
+0.3%
Levia
Levia
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
50.0%
+0.0%
Rhinar
Rhinar
55% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
49.6%
-0.4%
Lexi
Lexi
55% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
48.5%
-1.5%
Blaze, Firemind
Blaze, Firemind
Neutral
48.1%
-1.9%
Chane
Chane
25% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
47.4%
-2.6%
Iyslander
Iyslander
Poor
47.2%
-2.8%
Olympia
Olympia
25% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
47.0%
-3.0%
Azalea
Azalea
36% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
42.2%
-7.8%
Riptide
Riptide
25% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
42.2%
-7.8%
Florian
Florian
46% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
41.7%
-8.3%
Valda Brightaxe
Valda Brightaxe
51% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
40.8%
-9.2%
Dorinthea
Dorinthea
45% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
36.4%
-13.6%
Zen
Zen
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
33.7%
-16.3%
Viserai
Viserai
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
30.2%
-19.8%
Dorinthea, Quicksilver Prodigy
Dorinthea, Quicksilver Prodigy
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
25.4%
-24.6%
Lyath Goldmane
Lyath Goldmane
25% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
21.9%
-28.1%

Tournament Meta Summary

4
Well-Positioned Heroes
6
Neutral Heroes
12
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
44.9%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Highly diverse meta (10.1%)