Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

27 heroes • 149 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Oscilio
Oscilio
Excellent
60.4%
+10.4%
Dromai
Dromai
Good
54.6%
+4.6%
Oldhim
Oldhim
Good
53.8%
+3.8%
Enigma
Enigma
Good
53.7%
+3.7%
Briar
Briar
Good
53.5%
+3.5%
Bravo, Flattering Showman
Bravo, Flattering Showman
Good
52.0%
+2.0%
Chane
Chane
45% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
51.9%
+1.9%
Olympia
Olympia
24% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
49.1%
-0.9%
Fai
Fai
Neutral
48.7%
-1.3%
Lexi
Lexi
54% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
48.5%
-1.5%
Levia
Levia
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
47.3%
-2.7%
Rhinar
Rhinar
Poor
46.7%
-3.3%
Hala
Hala
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
46.7%
-3.3%
Valda Brightaxe
Valda Brightaxe
25% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
46.3%
-3.7%
Blaze, Firemind
Blaze, Firemind
Poor
45.4%
-4.6%
Iyslander
Iyslander
Very Poor
44.9%
-5.1%
Florian
Florian
25% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
44.9%
-5.1%
Dorinthea
Dorinthea
51% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
42.0%
-8.0%
Bravo
Bravo
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
41.6%
-8.4%
Boltyn
Boltyn
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
41.2%
-8.8%
Riptide
Riptide
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
41.2%
-8.8%
Aurora
Aurora
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
41.0%
-9.0%
Azalea
Azalea
25% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
38.1%
-11.9%
Dorinthea, Quicksilver Prodigy
Dorinthea, Quicksilver Prodigy
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
32.8%
-17.2%
Viserai
Viserai
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
28.4%
-21.6%
Dash
Dash
24% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
28.2%
-21.8%
Lyath Goldmane
Lyath Goldmane
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
24.7%
-25.3%

Tournament Meta Summary

6
Well-Positioned Heroes
4
Neutral Heroes
17
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
44.7%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Highly diverse meta (8.5%)