Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

25 heroes • 43 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Excellent
58.0%
+8.0%
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
Excellent
56.6%
+6.6%
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Excellent
55.7%
+5.7%
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Good
53.8%
+3.8%
Jarl Vetreiði
Jarl Vetreiði
Good
53.3%
+3.3%
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Neutral
51.5%
+1.5%
Dash I/O
Dash I/O
Neutral
51.4%
+1.4%
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Neutral
50.7%
+0.7%
Valda, Seismic Impact
Valda, Seismic Impact
Neutral
50.5%
+0.5%
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
Neutral
50.4%
+0.4%
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Neutral
50.2%
+0.2%
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Neutral
50.1%
+0.1%
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Neutral
49.2%
-0.8%
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
Neutral
48.4%
-1.6%
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
33% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
47.7%
-2.3%
Puffin, Hightail
Puffin, Hightail
Poor
46.4%
-3.6%
Zyggy Starlight
Zyggy Starlight
Poor
45.7%
-4.3%
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
Poor
45.6%
-4.4%
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
Poor
45.4%
-4.6%
Hala, Bladesaint of the Vow
Hala, Bladesaint of the Vow
60% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
44.3%
-5.7%
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Very Poor
43.7%
-6.3%
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
Very Poor
43.1%
-6.9%
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Very Poor
41.9%
-8.1%
Pleiades, Superstar
Pleiades, Superstar
38% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
38.2%
-11.8%
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
50% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
30.7%
-19.3%

Tournament Meta Summary

5
Well-Positioned Heroes
9
Neutral Heroes
11
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
48.1%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Moderately diverse meta (5.9%)