Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

11 heroes • 20 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Prism, Awakener of Sol
50% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
61.3%
+11.3%
Dash I/O
Dash I/O
Excellent
57.3%
+7.3%
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Excellent
55.6%
+5.6%
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Good
53.8%
+3.8%
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
47% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
50.3%
+0.3%
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
Poor
46.6%
-3.4%
Katsu, the Wanderer
Katsu, the Wanderer
Poor
46.4%
-3.6%
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
32% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
45.4%
-4.6%
Zyggy Starlight
Zyggy Starlight
Very Poor
41.6%
-8.4%
Hala, Bladesaint of the Vow
Hala, Bladesaint of the Vow
32% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
37.7%
-12.3%
Pleiades, Superstar
Pleiades, Superstar
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
29.2%
-20.8%

Tournament Meta Summary

4
Well-Positioned Heroes
1
Neutral Heroes
6
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
47.8%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Highly diverse meta (8.9%)