Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

25 heroes • 105 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Oldhim
Oldhim
Excellent
60.1%
+10.1%
Kassai, Cintari Sellsword
Kassai, Cintari Sellsword
27% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
56.9%
+6.9%
Briar
Briar
Excellent
56.7%
+6.7%
Terra
Terra
Excellent
56.2%
+6.2%
Ira, Crimson Haze
Ira, Crimson Haze
Excellent
55.8%
+5.8%
Vynnset
Vynnset
Good
53.8%
+3.8%
Dorinthea
Dorinthea
Good
53.5%
+3.5%
Valda Brightaxe
Valda Brightaxe
Good
52.9%
+2.9%
Kayo
Kayo
Good
52.1%
+2.1%
Bravo, Flattering Showman
Bravo, Flattering Showman
Neutral
51.9%
+1.9%
Iyslander
Iyslander
Neutral
49.9%
-0.1%
Fai
Fai
Poor
47.7%
-2.3%
Kano
Kano
Poor
47.2%
-2.8%
Levia
Levia
47% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
46.0%
-4.0%
Florian
Florian
Poor
45.5%
-4.5%
Aurora
Aurora
11% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
45.4%
-4.6%
Rhinar
Rhinar
Very Poor
43.8%
-6.2%
Enigma
Enigma
Very Poor
43.1%
-6.9%
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
41.8%
-8.2%
Dash
Dash
Very Poor
39.7%
-10.3%
Dromai
Dromai
Very Poor
39.6%
-10.4%
Arakni, Web of Deceit
Arakni, Web of Deceit
44% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
36.8%
-13.2%
Azalea
Azalea
58% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
30.1%
-19.9%
Nuu
Nuu
54% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
29.5%
-20.5%
Scurv, Stowaway
Scurv, Stowaway
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
21.0%
-29.0%

Tournament Meta Summary

9
Well-Positioned Heroes
2
Neutral Heroes
14
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
46.3%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Highly diverse meta (9.4%)