Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

26 heroes • 168 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Oldhim
Oldhim
Excellent
56.3%
+6.3%
Dorinthea
Dorinthea
Excellent
55.3%
+5.3%
Terra
Terra
Good
55.0%
+5.0%
Kano
Kano
Good
54.8%
+4.8%
Ira, Crimson Haze
Ira, Crimson Haze
Good
53.6%
+3.6%
Bravo, Flattering Showman
Bravo, Flattering Showman
Good
52.7%
+2.7%
Briar
Briar
Good
52.6%
+2.6%
Valda Brightaxe
Valda Brightaxe
Good
52.0%
+2.0%
Vynnset
Vynnset
Neutral
51.2%
+1.2%
Iyslander
Iyslander
Neutral
51.0%
+1.0%
Kayo
Kayo
Neutral
49.5%
-0.5%
Enigma
Enigma
Neutral
48.4%
-1.6%
Fai
Fai
Poor
47.6%
-2.4%
Riptide
Riptide
Poor
47.1%
-2.9%
Rhinar
Rhinar
Poor
45.4%
-4.6%
Florian
Florian
Very Poor
44.8%
-5.2%
Lyath Goldmane
Lyath Goldmane
17% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
43.7%
-6.3%
Lexi
Lexi
Very Poor
43.1%
-6.9%
Victor Goldmane
Victor Goldmane
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
42.2%
-7.8%
Pleiades
Pleiades
8% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
42.1%
-7.9%
Dash
Dash
Very Poor
40.6%
-9.4%
Levia
Levia
41% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
38.1%
-11.9%
Arakni, Web of Deceit
Arakni, Web of Deceit
34% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
36.6%
-13.4%
Dromai
Dromai
Very Poor
34.0%
-16.0%
Azalea
Azalea
60% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
29.9%
-20.1%
Zen
Zen
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
27.5%
-22.5%

Tournament Meta Summary

8
Well-Positioned Heroes
4
Neutral Heroes
14
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
46.0%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Highly diverse meta (7.8%)