Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

22 heroes • 190 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Dromai, Ash Artist
Dromai, Ash Artist
Excellent
56.5%
+6.5%
Kano, Dracai of Aether
Kano, Dracai of Aether
Excellent
56.0%
+6.0%
Maxx 'The Hype' Nitro
Maxx 'The Hype' Nitro
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
55.7%
+5.7%
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Excellent
55.2%
+5.2%
Dash, Inventor Extraordinaire
Dash, Inventor Extraordinaire
Good
54.1%
+4.1%
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Good
52.8%
+2.8%
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
Good
52.5%
+2.5%
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
Neutral
50.9%
+0.9%
Katsu, the Wanderer
Katsu, the Wanderer
Neutral
50.7%
+0.7%
Azalea, Ace in the Hole
Azalea, Ace in the Hole
Neutral
50.2%
+0.2%
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
Neutral
49.3%
-0.7%
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Neutral
48.9%
-1.1%
Olympia, Prized Fighter
Olympia, Prized Fighter
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
47.0%
-3.0%
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
Poor
46.9%
-3.1%
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
21% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
46.1%
-3.9%
Bravo, Showstopper
Bravo, Showstopper
Poor
45.9%
-4.1%
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Poor
45.7%
-4.3%
Uzuri, Switchblade
Uzuri, Switchblade
Very Poor
42.7%
-7.3%
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Very Poor
39.5%
-10.5%
Arakni, Huntsman
Arakni, Huntsman
26% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
36.4%
-13.6%
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
35.6%
-14.4%
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
17% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
34.6%
-15.4%

Tournament Meta Summary

7
Well-Positioned Heroes
5
Neutral Heroes
10
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
47.9%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Highly diverse meta (6.5%)