Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

30 heroes • 294 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Bravo, Showstopper
Bravo, Showstopper
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
60.2%
+10.2%
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Excellent
59.8%
+9.8%
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
Excellent
56.3%
+6.3%
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
14% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
54.1%
+4.1%
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
Good
53.1%
+3.1%
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Good
53.1%
+3.1%
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Good
52.8%
+2.8%
Jarl Vetreiði
Jarl Vetreiði
Good
52.6%
+2.6%
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Neutral
51.9%
+1.9%
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
49% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
51.5%
+1.5%
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
Neutral
50.9%
+0.9%
Arakni, Huntsman
Arakni, Huntsman
Neutral
50.8%
+0.8%
Valda, Seismic Impact
Valda, Seismic Impact
Neutral
50.8%
+0.8%
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Neutral
50.7%
+0.7%
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Neutral
50.6%
+0.6%
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Neutral
50.1%
+0.1%
Dash I/O
Dash I/O
Neutral
49.8%
-0.2%
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Poor
47.7%
-2.3%
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
Poor
47.5%
-2.5%
Katsu, the Wanderer
Katsu, the Wanderer
Poor
47.1%
-2.9%
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Poor
46.5%
-3.5%
Pleiades, Superstar
Pleiades, Superstar
59% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
46.5%
-3.5%
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
Poor
45.1%
-4.9%
Uzuri, Switchblade
Uzuri, Switchblade
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
44.9%
-5.1%
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Very Poor
44.2%
-5.8%
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
40% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
44.0%
-6.0%
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
22% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
39.9%
-10.1%
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
Very Poor
38.3%
-11.7%
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
34% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
35.9%
-14.1%
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
29.9%
-20.1%

Tournament Meta Summary

8
Well-Positioned Heroes
9
Neutral Heroes
13
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
48.6%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Highly diverse meta (6.4%)