Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

30 heroes • 294 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Excellent
59.3%
+9.3%
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
Excellent
55.5%
+5.5%
Bravo, Showstopper
Bravo, Showstopper
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
55.2%
+5.2%
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Good
54.6%
+4.6%
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Good
53.5%
+3.5%
Jarl Vetreiði
Jarl Vetreiði
Good
53.2%
+3.2%
Arakni, Huntsman
Arakni, Huntsman
Good
52.9%
+2.9%
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
Good
52.5%
+2.5%
Valda, Seismic Impact
Valda, Seismic Impact
Neutral
52.0%
+2.0%
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
Neutral
51.7%
+1.7%
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Neutral
51.2%
+1.2%
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Neutral
51.0%
+1.0%
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Neutral
50.9%
+0.9%
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
Neutral
50.0%
+0.0%
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Neutral
49.1%
-0.9%
Dash I/O
Dash I/O
Neutral
48.8%
-1.2%
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
40% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
47.6%
-2.4%
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
Poor
47.4%
-2.6%
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Poor
46.8%
-3.2%
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Poor
46.5%
-3.5%
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Poor
46.3%
-3.7%
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
Very Poor
44.7%
-5.3%
Uzuri, Switchblade
Uzuri, Switchblade
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
44.6%
-5.4%
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Very Poor
43.8%
-6.2%
Pleiades, Superstar
Pleiades, Superstar
Very Poor
43.8%
-6.2%
Katsu, the Wanderer
Katsu, the Wanderer
Very Poor
43.6%
-6.4%
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
Very Poor
40.2%
-9.8%
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
36% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
39.9%
-10.1%
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
Very Poor
39.3%
-10.7%
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
45% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
38.6%
-11.4%

Tournament Meta Summary

8
Well-Positioned Heroes
8
Neutral Heroes
14
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
48.5%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Moderately diverse meta (5.2%)