Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

29 heroes • 193 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Excellent
59.7%
+9.7%
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
Good
53.7%
+3.7%
Jarl Vetreiði
Jarl Vetreiði
Good
53.6%
+3.6%
Arakni, Huntsman
Arakni, Huntsman
Good
53.2%
+3.2%
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Good
52.6%
+2.6%
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
Good
52.2%
+2.2%
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Good
52.0%
+2.0%
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Neutral
51.8%
+1.8%
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Neutral
51.7%
+1.7%
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Neutral
51.5%
+1.5%
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Neutral
49.6%
-0.4%
Pleiades, Superstar
Pleiades, Superstar
Neutral
49.5%
-0.5%
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
Neutral
49.4%
-0.6%
Valda, Seismic Impact
Valda, Seismic Impact
Neutral
48.9%
-1.1%
Katsu, the Wanderer
Katsu, the Wanderer
Neutral
48.8%
-1.2%
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
Neutral
48.5%
-1.5%
Dash I/O
Dash I/O
Neutral
48.3%
-1.7%
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
55% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
48.0%
-2.0%
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Poor
46.8%
-3.2%
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
Poor
46.6%
-3.4%
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
16% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
46.1%
-3.9%
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
Very Poor
44.7%
-5.3%
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Very Poor
44.6%
-5.4%
Puffin, Hightail
Puffin, Hightail
Very Poor
43.7%
-6.3%
Betsy, Skin in the Game
Betsy, Skin in the Game
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
42.5%
-7.5%
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Very Poor
42.4%
-7.6%
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
Very Poor
37.6%
-12.4%
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
34% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
35.0%
-15.0%
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
23% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
32.4%
-17.6%

Tournament Meta Summary

7
Well-Positioned Heroes
10
Neutral Heroes
12
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
47.8%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Moderately diverse meta (5.8%)