Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

25 heroes • 147 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Valda Brightaxe
Valda Brightaxe
Excellent
61.0%
+11.0%
Oldhim
Oldhim
Excellent
56.8%
+6.8%
Ira, Crimson Haze
Ira, Crimson Haze
Excellent
55.9%
+5.9%
Briar
Briar
Good
54.7%
+4.7%
Kayo
Kayo
Good
54.2%
+4.2%
Kano
Kano
Good
54.0%
+4.0%
Bravo, Flattering Showman
Bravo, Flattering Showman
Good
52.8%
+2.8%
Dorinthea
Dorinthea
Good
52.7%
+2.7%
Olympia
Olympia
49% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
51.8%
+1.8%
Vynnset
Vynnset
Neutral
50.7%
+0.7%
Iyslander
Iyslander
Neutral
48.6%
-1.4%
Riptide
Riptide
Neutral
48.2%
-1.8%
Fai
Fai
Poor
47.6%
-2.4%
Dash
Dash
Poor
46.3%
-3.7%
Rhinar
Rhinar
Poor
45.7%
-4.3%
Florian
Florian
Poor
45.2%
-4.8%
Levia
Levia
40% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
43.1%
-6.9%
Enigma
Enigma
Very Poor
42.8%
-7.2%
Lexi
Lexi
Very Poor
42.2%
-7.8%
Lyath Goldmane
Lyath Goldmane
8% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
39.7%
-10.3%
Dromai
Dromai
Very Poor
33.9%
-16.1%
Nuu
Nuu
51% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
33.2%
-16.8%
Azalea
Azalea
Very Poor
32.9%
-17.1%
Zen
Zen
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
30.2%
-19.8%
Arakni, Web of Deceit
Arakni, Web of Deceit
26% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
29.9%
-20.1%

Tournament Meta Summary

8
Well-Positioned Heroes
4
Neutral Heroes
13
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
46.2%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Highly diverse meta (8.7%)