Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

26 heroes • 93 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Oldhim
Oldhim
Excellent
58.8%
+8.8%
Kayo
Kayo
Excellent
55.5%
+5.5%
Ira, Crimson Haze
Ira, Crimson Haze
Excellent
55.4%
+5.4%
Briar
Briar
Excellent
55.2%
+5.2%
Valda Brightaxe
Valda Brightaxe
Excellent
55.0%
+5.0%
Terra
Terra
Good
53.9%
+3.9%
Bravo, Flattering Showman
Bravo, Flattering Showman
Good
53.8%
+3.8%
Dorinthea
Dorinthea
Good
53.5%
+3.5%
Kano
Kano
Good
52.9%
+2.9%
Aurora
Aurora
25% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
52.5%
+2.5%
Dromai
Dromai
Neutral
51.1%
+1.1%
Fai
Fai
Neutral
50.9%
+0.9%
Iyslander
Iyslander
Neutral
50.3%
+0.3%
Rhinar
Rhinar
Neutral
49.1%
-0.9%
Lexi
Lexi
Poor
47.4%
-2.6%
Arakni
Arakni
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
47.3%
-2.7%
Enigma
Enigma
Poor
47.1%
-2.9%
Riptide
Riptide
60% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
46.8%
-3.2%
Florian
Florian
Very Poor
42.1%
-7.9%
Dash
Dash
Very Poor
39.1%
-10.9%
Nuu
Nuu
50% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
38.4%
-11.6%
Levia
Levia
36% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
37.1%
-12.9%
Azalea
Azalea
58% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
32.1%
-17.9%
Arakni, Web of Deceit
Arakni, Web of Deceit
39% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
29.3%
-20.7%
Data Doll MKII
Data Doll MKII
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
22.8%
-27.2%
Tuffnut
Tuffnut
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
16.3%
-33.7%

Tournament Meta Summary

10
Well-Positioned Heroes
4
Neutral Heroes
12
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
45.9%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Highly diverse meta (10.7%)