Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

37 heroes • 361 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Dorinthea
Dorinthea
Excellent
58.2%
+8.2%
Fang
Fang
18% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
55.8%
+5.8%
Kano
Kano
Excellent
55.2%
+5.2%
Ira, Crimson Haze
Ira, Crimson Haze
Good
54.3%
+4.3%
Briar
Briar
Good
54.1%
+4.1%
Oldhim
Oldhim
Good
54.0%
+4.0%
Olympia
Olympia
44% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
53.3%
+3.3%
Bravo, Flattering Showman
Bravo, Flattering Showman
Good
53.1%
+3.1%
Kayo
Kayo
Good
53.1%
+3.1%
Prism
Prism
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
51.4%
+1.4%
Fai
Fai
Neutral
50.3%
+0.3%
Valda Brightaxe
Valda Brightaxe
Neutral
50.2%
+0.2%
Kassai, Cintari Sellsword
Kassai, Cintari Sellsword
24% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
49.1%
-0.9%
Iyslander
Iyslander
Neutral
48.8%
-1.2%
Enigma
Enigma
Poor
47.9%
-2.1%
Lexi
Lexi
Poor
47.6%
-2.4%
Florian
Florian
Poor
46.9%
-3.1%
Rhinar
Rhinar
Poor
46.3%
-3.7%
Vynnset
Vynnset
Poor
46.0%
-4.0%
Dromai
Dromai
Poor
45.9%
-4.1%
Aurora
Aurora
28% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
44.1%
-5.9%
Riptide
Riptide
Very Poor
42.4%
-7.6%
Benji, the Piercing Wind
Benji, the Piercing Wind
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
39.9%
-10.1%
Azalea
Azalea
Very Poor
39.4%
-10.6%
Gravy Bones
Gravy Bones
18% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
38.7%
-11.3%
Nuu
Nuu
56% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
36.8%
-13.2%
Dash
Dash
Very Poor
36.7%
-13.3%
Lyath Goldmane
Lyath Goldmane
33% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
36.5%
-13.5%
Levia
Levia
28% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
36.4%
-13.6%
Kayo, Strong-arm
Kayo, Strong-arm
24% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
36.2%
-13.8%
Pleiades
Pleiades
24% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
36.0%
-14.0%
Arakni, Web of Deceit
Arakni, Web of Deceit
45% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
35.3%
-14.7%
Zen
Zen
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
33.7%
-16.3%
Tuffnut
Tuffnut
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
30.3%
-19.7%
Marlynn
Marlynn
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
29.6%
-20.4%
Viserai
Viserai
18% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
26.7%
-23.3%
Scurv, Stowaway
Scurv, Stowaway
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
22.4%
-27.6%

Tournament Meta Summary

9
Well-Positioned Heroes
5
Neutral Heroes
23
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
43.9%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Highly diverse meta (9.0%)