Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

49 heroes • 742 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Dorinthea
Dorinthea
Excellent
58.2%
+8.2%
Fang
Fang
19% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
56.2%
+6.2%
Kano
Kano
Excellent
56.0%
+6.0%
Oldhim
Oldhim
Excellent
56.0%
+6.0%
Ira, Crimson Haze
Ira, Crimson Haze
Good
54.7%
+4.7%
Bravo, Flattering Showman
Bravo, Flattering Showman
Good
54.6%
+4.6%
Briar
Briar
Good
54.2%
+4.2%
Olympia
Olympia
45% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
54.1%
+4.1%
Kayo
Kayo
Good
53.2%
+3.2%
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
52.5%
+2.5%
Oscilio
Oscilio
53% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
51.6%
+1.6%
Valda Brightaxe
Valda Brightaxe
Neutral
51.0%
+1.0%
Fai
Fai
Neutral
50.8%
+0.8%
Iyslander
Iyslander
Neutral
49.8%
-0.2%
Prism
Prism
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
49.2%
-0.8%
Enigma
Enigma
Neutral
49.0%
-1.0%
Kassai, Cintari Sellsword
Kassai, Cintari Sellsword
26% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
48.7%
-1.3%
Rhinar
Rhinar
Neutral
48.2%
-1.8%
Vynnset
Vynnset
Poor
47.6%
-2.4%
Cindra
Cindra
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
47.2%
-2.8%
Florian
Florian
Poor
47.0%
-3.0%
Lexi
Lexi
Poor
46.5%
-3.5%
Kassai
Kassai
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
46.5%
-3.5%
Terra
Terra
Poor
45.8%
-4.2%
Dromai
Dromai
Poor
45.2%
-4.8%
Aurora
Aurora
30% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
42.9%
-7.1%
Riptide
Riptide
Very Poor
42.8%
-7.2%
Azalea
Azalea
Very Poor
40.7%
-9.3%
Arakni, Web of Deceit
Arakni, Web of Deceit
44% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
39.3%
-10.7%
Gravy Bones
Gravy Bones
19% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
39.3%
-10.7%
Puffin
Puffin
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
38.2%
-11.8%
Benji, the Piercing Wind
Benji, the Piercing Wind
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
36.9%
-13.1%
Dash
Dash
Very Poor
36.5%
-13.5%
Nuu
Nuu
56% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
36.0%
-14.0%
Kayo, Strong-arm
Kayo, Strong-arm
26% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
35.8%
-14.2%
Lyath Goldmane
Lyath Goldmane
35% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
35.8%
-14.2%
Pleiades
Pleiades
26% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
35.6%
-14.4%
Levia
Levia
30% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
35.0%
-15.0%
Kayo, Berserker Runt
Kayo, Berserker Runt
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
34.2%
-15.8%
Maxx Nitro
Maxx Nitro
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
34.0%
-16.0%
Zen
Zen
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
33.0%
-17.0%
Dash, Database
Dash, Database
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
32.8%
-17.2%
Marlynn
Marlynn
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
30.2%
-19.8%
Betsy
Betsy
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
30.1%
-19.9%
Boltyn
Boltyn
19% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
29.7%
-20.3%
Tuffnut
Tuffnut
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
29.5%
-20.5%
Viserai
Viserai
19% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
29.4%
-20.6%
Verdance
Verdance
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
24.9%
-25.1%
Scurv, Stowaway
Scurv, Stowaway
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
21.8%
-28.2%

Tournament Meta Summary

10
Well-Positioned Heroes
8
Neutral Heroes
31
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
42.8%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Highly diverse meta (9.4%)