Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

30 heroes • 284 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
Excellent
56.3%
+6.3%
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
Good
54.4%
+4.4%
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
Good
54.2%
+4.2%
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Good
53.3%
+3.3%
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
Good
53.1%
+3.1%
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Good
52.4%
+2.4%
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Neutral
51.8%
+1.8%
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Neutral
51.7%
+1.7%
Dash I/O
Dash I/O
Neutral
49.6%
-0.4%
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Neutral
48.9%
-1.1%
Betsy, Skin in the Game
Betsy, Skin in the Game
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
48.5%
-1.5%
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Neutral
48.0%
-2.0%
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
Poor
47.5%
-2.5%
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
Poor
46.7%
-3.3%
Arakni, Huntsman
Arakni, Huntsman
Poor
46.6%
-3.4%
Katsu, the Wanderer
Katsu, the Wanderer
Poor
45.4%
-4.6%
Jarl Vetreiði
Jarl Vetreiði
Poor
45.3%
-4.7%
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Poor
45.2%
-4.8%
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
Very Poor
44.6%
-5.4%
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Very Poor
44.2%
-5.8%
Pleiades, Superstar
Pleiades, Superstar
Very Poor
44.2%
-5.8%
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
41% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
44.1%
-5.9%
Puffin, Hightail
Puffin, Hightail
Very Poor
43.7%
-6.3%
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Very Poor
42.4%
-7.6%
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Very Poor
42.4%
-7.6%
Valda, Seismic Impact
Valda, Seismic Impact
41% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
38.2%
-11.8%
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
24% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
37.8%
-12.2%
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
Very Poor
37.2%
-12.8%
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
Very Poor
36.3%
-13.7%
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Fai, Rising Rebellion
17% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
36.2%
-13.8%

Tournament Meta Summary

6
Well-Positioned Heroes
6
Neutral Heroes
18
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
46.3%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Moderately diverse meta (5.6%)