Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

27 heroes • 92 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
Excellent
58.4%
+8.4%
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Excellent
56.1%
+6.1%
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
Excellent
55.0%
+5.0%
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
Good
54.8%
+4.8%
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
Good
54.4%
+4.4%
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Good
53.5%
+3.5%
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Good
52.5%
+2.5%
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Neutral
50.8%
+0.8%
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
Neutral
50.6%
+0.6%
Dash I/O
Dash I/O
Neutral
50.2%
+0.2%
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Neutral
49.9%
-0.1%
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Neutral
49.8%
-0.2%
Pleiades, Superstar
Pleiades, Superstar
Neutral
49.2%
-0.8%
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
48.9%
-1.1%
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Neutral
48.4%
-1.6%
Arakni, Huntsman
Arakni, Huntsman
Poor
47.5%
-2.5%
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Poor
47.1%
-2.9%
Katsu, the Wanderer
Katsu, the Wanderer
48% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
46.6%
-3.4%
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
Poor
46.1%
-3.9%
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
34% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
45.8%
-4.2%
Jarl Vetreiði
Jarl Vetreiði
Very Poor
43.3%
-6.7%
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Very Poor
43.3%
-6.7%
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Very Poor
42.8%
-7.2%
Puffin, Hightail
Puffin, Hightail
Very Poor
42.0%
-8.0%
Valda, Seismic Impact
Valda, Seismic Impact
36% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
38.1%
-11.9%
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
38.1%
-11.9%
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
Very Poor
34.6%
-15.4%

Tournament Meta Summary

7
Well-Positioned Heroes
8
Neutral Heroes
12
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
48.1%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Moderately diverse meta (5.7%)