Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

16 heroes • 46 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Chane, Bound by Shadow
Chane, Bound by Shadow
Excellent
69.9%
+19.9%
Bravo, Star of the Show
Bravo, Star of the Show
Excellent
60.5%
+10.5%
Nuu, Alluring Desire
Nuu, Alluring Desire
58% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
58.2%
+8.2%
Briar, Warden of Thorns
Briar, Warden of Thorns
Neutral
51.5%
+1.5%
Viserai, Rune Blood
Viserai, Rune Blood
Neutral
51.1%
+1.1%
Dromai, Ash Artist
Dromai, Ash Artist
Neutral
50.6%
+0.6%
Dash I/O
Dash I/O
Neutral
50.4%
+0.4%
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
Neutral
49.2%
-0.8%
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
27% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
49.1%
-0.9%
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
Very Poor
43.9%
-6.1%
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
41.7%
-8.3%
Puffin, Hightail
Puffin, Hightail
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
40.0%
-10.0%
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
38.8%
-11.2%
Kano, Dracai of Aether
Kano, Dracai of Aether
59% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
36.7%
-13.3%
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
30.0%
-20.0%
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Prism, Awakener of Sol
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
14.8%
-35.2%

Tournament Meta Summary

3
Well-Positioned Heroes
6
Neutral Heroes
7
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
46.0%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Highly diverse meta (12.4%)