Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

22 heroes • 79 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Kano, Dracai of Aether
Kano, Dracai of Aether
Excellent
61.9%
+11.9%
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
Excellent
57.2%
+7.2%
Nuu, Alluring Desire
Nuu, Alluring Desire
Good
54.1%
+4.1%
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
Good
53.6%
+3.6%
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Good
53.1%
+3.1%
Azalea, Ace in the Hole
Azalea, Ace in the Hole
Neutral
51.8%
+1.8%
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Neutral
51.6%
+1.6%
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
Neutral
51.3%
+1.3%
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
24% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
50.5%
+0.5%
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Neutral
50.5%
+0.5%
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Neutral
50.4%
+0.4%
Jarl Vetreiði
Jarl Vetreiði
Neutral
49.1%
-0.9%
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Neutral
48.5%
-1.5%
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
Poor
45.6%
-4.4%
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Poor
45.4%
-4.6%
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Very Poor
43.9%
-6.1%
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Very Poor
43.7%
-6.3%
Dash, Inventor Extraordinaire
Dash, Inventor Extraordinaire
12% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
41.6%
-8.4%
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Very Poor
40.7%
-9.3%
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
Very Poor
38.4%
-11.6%
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
26% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
35.4%
-14.6%
Katsu, the Wanderer
Katsu, the Wanderer
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
31.5%
-18.5%

Tournament Meta Summary

5
Well-Positioned Heroes
8
Neutral Heroes
9
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
47.7%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Highly diverse meta (7.1%)