Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

18 heroes • 29 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Dash, Database
Dash, Database
30% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
70.9%
+20.9%
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
40% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
58.7%
+8.7%
Kayo
Kayo
54% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
55.6%
+5.6%
Data Doll MKII
Data Doll MKII
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
53.9%
+3.9%
Betsy
Betsy
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
53.6%
+3.6%
Oscilio
Oscilio
11% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
52.9%
+2.9%
Dromai
Dromai
11% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
51.3%
+1.3%
Vynnset
Vynnset
36% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
50.4%
+0.4%
Blaze, Firemind
Blaze, Firemind
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
49.4%
-0.6%
Verdance
Verdance
32% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
49.0%
-1.0%
Aurora
Aurora
31% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
47.1%
-2.9%
Bravo
Bravo
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
46.4%
-3.6%
Prism
Prism
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
46.4%
-3.6%
Nuu
Nuu
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
42.6%
-7.4%
Scurv, Stowaway
Scurv, Stowaway
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
37.5%
-12.5%
Fai
Fai
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
35.2%
-14.8%
Riptide
Riptide
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
34.4%
-15.6%
Lexi
Lexi
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
34.0%
-16.0%

Tournament Meta Summary

6
Well-Positioned Heroes
4
Neutral Heroes
8
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
48.3%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Highly diverse meta (9.1%)