Expected win rates if each hero faced a random opponent from this tournament's field. Weighted by actual hero representation.

Rolling Window Analysis

24 heroes • 60 players • Based on meta expectations
HeroPositioningExpected Win Ratevs BaselineDetails
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
Excellent
57.8%
+7.8%
Dash I/O
Dash I/O
Excellent
57.2%
+7.2%
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
Excellent
56.2%
+6.2%
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Excellent
56.1%
+6.1%
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
Excellent
55.5%
+5.5%
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Excellent
55.4%
+5.4%
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Good
53.3%
+3.3%
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
Good
53.1%
+3.1%
Kano, Dracai of Aether
Kano, Dracai of Aether
Good
52.4%
+2.4%
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Neutral
51.2%
+1.2%
Azalea, Ace in the Hole
Azalea, Ace in the Hole
Neutral
50.6%
+0.6%
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
Neutral
50.4%
+0.4%
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Neutral
50.0%
-0.0%
Jarl Vetreiði
Jarl Vetreiði
Neutral
49.4%
-0.6%
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Poor
46.6%
-3.4%
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
Very Poor
44.9%
-5.1%
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
Very Poor
44.5%
-5.5%
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
36% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
40.6%
-9.4%
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Very Poor
40.0%
-10.0%
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
58% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
38.4%
-11.6%
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
42% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
37.5%
-12.5%
Puffin, Hightail
Puffin, Hightail
Very Poor
37.4%
-12.6%
Arakni, Huntsman
Arakni, Huntsman
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
36.7%
-13.3%
Uzuri, Switchblade
Uzuri, Switchblade
0% coverage (need ≥60%)
Insufficient Data
29.4%
-20.6%

Tournament Meta Summary

9
Well-Positioned Heroes
5
Neutral Heroes
10
Poorly-Positioned Heroes
47.7%
Average Expected WR
Meta Analysis: Highly diverse meta (7.8%)