Win Rate Leaderboard
Top players by win percentage in Last 3 Months
Bayesian Smoothed Win Rate
This leaderboard uses Bayesian smoothing to provide more reliable win rate estimates, especially for players with fewer games. The smoothed win rate balances a player's actual performance with the overall average, giving more weight to actual results as sample size increases.
Calculation Method
Smoothed Win Rate = (Player Wins + 13 × Global Average) ÷ (Player Games + 13)
The global average is currently 50.2% — the overall win rate across all competitive matches (naturally near 50% since every match has one winner and one loser).
W = 13 games — the median number of matches played by players in the selected period. This self-calibrates as the dataset grows: players with fewer games than the median are pulled toward the global average; players with more games are ranked primarily on their actual results.
Why This Approach?
Raw win percentages can be misleading for players with few games. A player who goes 3-0 would have 100% win rate, but this doesn't reflect true skill level. Bayesian smoothing gives these players a rating closer to the global average until they accumulate more games to prove their performance.
Example
Player A: 3 wins, 0 losses (100% raw) → 59.6% smoothed
Player B: 45 wins, 15 losses (75% raw) → 70.6% smoothed
Player B's rating is more trustworthy due to larger sample size.
| Rank | Player | Win Rate | Record | Games |
|---|---|---|---|---|
#351 | Indonesia | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#352 | Indonesia | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#353 | Indonesia | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#354 | Malaysia | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#355 | Australia | 52.7% | 4-2-1 | 7 |
#356 | Singapore | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#357 | United States | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#358 | United States | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#359 | United States | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#360 | United States | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#361 | United States | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#362 | United States | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#363 | Brazil | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#364 | United States | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#365 | Japan | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#366 | Japan | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#367 | Japan | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#368 | Hong Kong | 52.7% | 4-2-1 | 7 |
#369 | Japan | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#370 | Japan | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#371 | Brazil | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#372 | Indonesia | 52.7% | 4-2-1 | 7 |
#373 | Brazil | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#374 | Brazil | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#375 | Taiwan | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#376 | United States | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#377 | United States | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#378 | Indonesia | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#379 | Brazil | 52.7% | 4-2-1 | 7 |
#380 | United States | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#381 | United States | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#382 | Japan | 52.7% | 4-1-2 | 7 |
#383 | Japan | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#384 | Japan | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#385 | Brazil | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#386 | Brazil | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#387 | Brazil | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#388 | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 | |
#389 | Brazil | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#390 | Chile | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#391 | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 | |
#392 | Brazil | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#393 | Argentina | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#394 | Brazil | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#395 | Chile | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#396 | Brazil | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#397 | Brazil | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#398 | Brazil | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#399 | Brazil | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |
#400 | Brazil | 52.7% | 4-3-0 | 7 |