Win Rate Leaderboard
Data through August 2026
Top players by win percentage in Last 3 Months
Bayesian Smoothed Win Rate
This leaderboard uses Bayesian smoothing to provide more reliable win rate estimates, especially for players with fewer games. The smoothed win rate balances a player's actual performance with the overall average, giving more weight to actual results as sample size increases.
Calculation Method
Smoothed Win Rate = (Player Wins + 13 × Global Average) ÷ (Player Games + 13)
The global average is currently 50.2% — the overall win rate across all competitive matches (naturally near 50% since every match has one winner and one loser).
W = 13 games — the median number of matches played by players in the selected period. This self-calibrates as the dataset grows: players with fewer games than the median are pulled toward the global average; players with more games are ranked primarily on their actual results.
Why This Approach?
Raw win percentages can be misleading for players with few games. A player who goes 3-0 would have 100% win rate, but this doesn't reflect true skill level. Bayesian smoothing gives these players a rating closer to the global average until they accumulate more games to prove their performance.
Example
Player A: 3 wins, 0 losses (100% raw) → 59.6% smoothed
Player B: 45 wins, 15 losses (75% raw) → 70.6% smoothed
Player B's rating is more trustworthy due to larger sample size.
| Rank | Player | Win Rate | Record | Games |
|---|---|---|---|---|
#2001 | Germany | 39.6% | 1-5-0 | 6 |
#2002 | Germany | 39.6% | 1-5-0 | 6 |
#2003 | United States | 39.6% | 1-5-0 | 6 |
#2004 | United States | 39.6% | 1-5-0 | 6 |
#2005 | United States | 39.6% | 1-5-0 | 6 |
#2006 | Canada | 38.8% | 2-7-0 | 9 |
#2007 | United States | 38.8% | 2-7-0 | 9 |
#2008 | United States | 38.8% | 2-7-0 | 9 |
#2009 | United States | 38.8% | 2-7-0 | 9 |
#2010 | Poland | 38.4% | 0-4-0 | 4 |
#2011 | Netherlands | 38.4% | 0-4-0 | 4 |
#2012 | United States | 38.4% | 0-3-1 | 4 |
#2013 | United States | 38.4% | 0-4-0 | 4 |
#2014 | United States | 38.4% | 0-4-0 | 4 |
#2015 | United States | 38.4% | 0-4-0 | 4 |
#2016 | United States | 38.4% | 0-4-0 | 4 |
#2017 | United States | 38.4% | 0-4-0 | 4 |
#2018 | United States | 38.4% | 0-4-0 | 4 |
#2019 | Canada | 38.4% | 0-4-0 | 4 |
#2020 | Germany | 38.4% | 0-4-0 | 4 |
#2021 | Japan | 38.4% | 0-4-0 | 4 |
#2022 | Austria | 38.4% | 0-4-0 | 4 |
#2023 | Germany | 38.4% | 0-4-0 | 4 |
#2024 | United Kingdom | 38.4% | 0-4-0 | 4 |
#2025 | Austria | 38.4% | 0-4-0 | 4 |
#2026 | United Kingdom | 38.4% | 0-4-0 | 4 |
#2027 | Belgium | 38.4% | 0-4-0 | 4 |
#2028 | Japan | 38.4% | 0-4-0 | 4 |
#2029 | Japan | 38.4% | 0-4-0 | 4 |
#2030 | United States | 38.4% | 0-4-0 | 4 |
#2031 | United States | 38.4% | 0-4-0 | 4 |
#2032 | Canada | 38.4% | 0-4-0 | 4 |
#2033 | United Kingdom | 38.4% | 0-4-0 | 4 |
#2034 | Switzerland | 38.4% | 0-3-1 | 4 |
#2035 | Germany | 38.4% | 0-4-0 | 4 |
#2036 | Germany | 38.4% | 0-4-0 | 4 |
#2037 | Germany | 38.4% | 0-4-0 | 4 |
#2038 | United States | 38.4% | 0-4-0 | 4 |
#2039 | United States | 38.4% | 0-4-0 | 4 |
#2040 | United States | 38.1% | 3-9-0 | 12 |
#2041 | United States | 37.6% | 1-6-0 | 7 |
#2042 | Belgium | 37.6% | 1-6-0 | 7 |
#2043 | Japan | 37.6% | 1-6-0 | 7 |
#2044 | Japan | 37.6% | 1-5-1 | 7 |
#2045 | Japan | 37.6% | 1-6-0 | 7 |
#2046 | Japan | 37.6% | 1-6-0 | 7 |
#2047 | United Kingdom | 37.6% | 1-6-0 | 7 |
#2048 | United Kingdom | 37.6% | 1-6-0 | 7 |
#2049 | Germany | 37.6% | 1-6-0 | 7 |
#2050 | Poland | 37.6% | 1-6-0 | 7 |